The calls from certain commentators to demand full capitulation on the public media issue were startling to many observers. The debate has long been framed within a familiar pattern that prioritizes image over substance, a shorthand that tends to reduce complex political conflicts to optics. Critics frequently argue that this struggle matters only to a segment of the electorate that is perceived as staunchly loyal, sometimes delivered with a tone of dismissiveness. There is a suggestion that the most committed PiS voters should help various actors maneuver the political center, all while discarding core, enduring priorities. In reality, the so-called center appears ill-defined, as if it consists of factions that march behind loud narratives, yet lack clear, long-term political visions.
The issue at stake is grave. The media battle is inseparable from the broader question of upholding the rule of law. A decisive victory by the December 13 coalition, if achieved at a low price, and the acceptance of aggressive methods to seize state institutions, could spell the erosion of any meaningful chance for change in Poland. Independent institutions would be quickly absorbed, and media with a strong, distinct identity could be targeted. Over time, the whole media landscape might drift toward weaker identities, including outlets that are at least partially independent. The endgame would resemble a delegation of power to the forces that aim to control the narrative of freedom and national sovereignty.
After a setback of the magnitude seen on October 15, hoping for a rapid reversal or an immediate pathway back to power would be dangerous. The goals must be reconsidered in this new light. First, the priority is preserving existing structures, networks, and organizational foundations. Second, a firm stand against the authorities’ malign tendencies and a defense of freedom is necessary. Third, there is a need to shift to an oppositional stance that requires a different mindset, tactics, and approaches. Fourth, patience becomes essential.
Anyone seeking a quick turnaround on October 15 risks disappointment and real defeat. The current imperative is to defend democracy and pluralism. Only when the rule of law is safeguarded from attempts to overturn it can the classic power game regain coherence. Without political freedom in Poland, even the strongest public image cannot sustain trust. Consequently, analysis of social attitudes must not serve as an excuse for retreat or surrender. The situation calls for a steady, principled response rather than impulsive moves that could undermine fundamental rights.
Readers observed a sharp, provocative example in the media arena: a remark that signaled the deep entrenchment of the struggle between state institutions and those who seek to shape the public discourse. This vivid reference underscores how the environment has evolved since that moment and why a careful, resolute stance is required going forward. The overarching message is clear: the defense of democratic norms and the protection of independent institutions are not peripheral concerns but core elements of national resilience. [Citation: wPolityce]