In a televised discussion, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak voiced support for a two-state solution as a framework for resolving the long-running Palestine-Israel conflict. He also distanced the stance of London’s ambassador to Israel, Tzipi Hotovely, who had suggested that a feasible peace process and a Palestinian state could not be achieved. Sunak’s remarks were shared on a major UK television channel, underscoring a commitment to a path that envisions a sovereign Palestinian state alongside Israel.
Sunak asserted that a two-state solution stands as the correct outcome for the conflict. This position reflects a traditional British emphasis on negotiated peace and regional stability, even as it invites debate about the practical steps required to realize such an arrangement.
When questioned about Hotovely’s comments, Sunak clarified that the British government does not align with her expressed view. The exchange highlights a divergence within allied capitals over the best route to peace and the feasibility of redrawing regional security guarantees.
Earlier, Hotovely had argued that the concept of establishing a Palestinian state in Gaza required careful consideration and stressed that the historical failures of the Oslo process stemmed from a misalignment. In her view, the Palestinian leadership has pursued a state from the river to the sea, rather than accepting coexistence alongside Israel. This stance points to enduring tensions over borders, security, and recognition that have repeatedly shaped diplomacy in the region.
In the 1990s, collaborations between Israelis and Palestinians culminated in agreements known as Oslo I and Oslo II. These accords led to the creation of the Palestinian Authority and set out a framework for phased negotiations, security arrangements, and interim governance structures while negotiations continued on broader final-status issues.
London has previously indicated a willingness to increase support for Palestinian development and humanitarian relief. The prospect of augmented aid is often tied to conditions related to governance, security coordination, and progress toward a durable political settlement. The evolving stance of allied governments remains a focal point in diplomatic discussions about the prospects for peace in the Middle East.