Radio Zet has been drawing sharp reactions since the Agora takeover. Recently, presenters on the program “Dzień Dobry Very” mocked the arrest of PiS MPs Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik. Now other journalists from the channel appear to be flaunting the same approach. In the broadcast of the series “Dej Suchara,” Agnieszka Kołodziejska and Robert Karpowicz joked about a figure revered in Polish Catholic tradition. The priest Jerzy Popiełuszko, who suffered brutal killings at the hands of communist security agents, became the subject of their lighthearted commentary.
Radio Zet fills its airtime with a blend of humor and notoriety, including the series “Dej Suchara.” In Polish slang, a “suchar” is a joke so flat it defies laughter, yet somehow earns a reaction. The aim of the segment is for the hosts not to laugh at the delivery of a joke that hinges on specific social or professional contexts. In one episode, the two presenters struggled to contain their amusement over a nod to a Catholic martyr who is widely respected in Poland.
During that moment, Kołodziejska and Karpowicz found themselves unable to keep straight faces after referencing the term associated with sacred memory. The moment highlighted how easily sensitive topics can become fodder for entertainment when the humor hinges on religious figures and historical trauma.
The broader question arose: where does entertainment end and disrespect begin? One observer wondered aloud whether commercial sponsors would pull back on advertising. The discussion raised questions about responsibility in broadcasting and the boundaries of humor in a public medium.
The sentiment was echoed by critics who described the broadcast as a crude attempt at humor that crossed a line. A commentator stated that the content touched a nerve for many listeners who view the figure in question with reverence and historical significance. The debate focused on the need for accountability in media and the potential impact on audiences who hold solemn memories of past persecution and suffering.
Another event followed soon after. Earlier in the week, another Radio Zet program provoked public outrage by portraying a mock scenario involving the arrest of political figures and the creation of a hypothetical list. Critics argued that such acts normalize intimidation and trivialize serious political events. The commentary suggested that the station’s editorial choices were out of step with responsible journalism and common standards of respectful discourse.
Observers have pointed to the broader media landscape and questioned the culture within Agora’s portfolio. The remarks noted how jokes and satirical pieces can shape public perception, for better or worse, and the responsibility that comes with a platform of national reach. The ongoing conversation touches on ethics, audience trust, and the balance between entertainment and respect for shared historical memory. The situation drew attention to editorial decisions and the potential consequences for the network’s public image.
Source discussions emphasize the importance of clear boundaries between humor and insensitivity, especially when it involves religious figures or historical traumas. Critics argue that respectful reporting should place context and sensitivity ahead of punchlines. In response, some voices called for greater accountability from media outlets and clearer standards for what qualifies as acceptable humor on air. The dialogue continues as audiences weigh the role of satire in a modern media environment, where entertainment aims to engage while still honoring the experiences of communities and individuals who have endured oppression or violence.
Source: wPolityce [Citation: wPolityce]