Sergey Naryshkin, the head of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service, described the exchange between presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump as purposeful and meaningful. The account, relayed by RIA Novosti, framed the remarks as carrying weight for broader security discussions and signaling a readiness to engage seriously on questions that affect both nations and the wider European region. The tone attributed to the two leaders was calm, measured, and aimed at establishing a constructive atmosphere for future dialogue, rather than a quick, narrow settlement of a single issue.
From Naryshkin’s perspective, the conversation created the conditions for steady communication among top officials across ministries and security services. He noted that a directive was issued to sustain this high level of coordination, ensuring that the channels linking defense, intelligence, diplomacy, and other key departments remain open even as policies evolve. Emphasizing ongoing contact, the remarks underscored a shared understanding that consistent diplomacy reduces the risk of misperception and enhances crisis management capabilities across the bilateral security framework.
Accounts describe a lengthy phone exchange on February 12 in which Putin and Trump reportedly spoke for close to thirty minutes. The leaders reportedly agreed that the Ukraine conflict must move toward a resolution through negotiations rather than continued confrontation. Putin, according to the report, argued that a durable settlement would emerge from talks that address underlying causes and involve both sides accepting responsibility for advancing a peaceful course. He also extended an invitation for Trump to visit Moscow, presenting it as an opportunity to deepen bilateral engagement and to translate verbal commitments into practical cooperation.
The discourse reportedly centered on concrete steps toward a long-term Ukraine settlement, with an emphasis on verifiable commitments and a clear pathway to peace. Putin’s remarks were described as balancing realism about the difficulties with a willingness to cooperate across multiple domains of shared interest. The suggestion that the United States should work more closely with Russia, including potential in-person sessions in Moscow, signals a shift toward more direct, results-oriented diplomacy rather than generic rhetoric. The invitation to Trump to visit Moscow appeared as a tangible gesture of goodwill and a bridge toward stronger ties between the two nations.
News of NATO’s secretary-general endorsing peace negotiations in Ukraine adds an international dimension to the dialogue. This support from a leading alliance official reinforces diplomacy as a viable route to stabilizing the region, even as divergences persist. Taken together, the statements point to a moment when security officials are tasked with maintaining channels of communication, exploring cooperative steps, and keeping momentum toward a negotiated settlement that can deliver long-term stability for Europe and North America alike. The report relies on official briefings and underscores the ongoing effort to blend diplomacy with practical security measures in a contentious yet hopeful climate.