Deputy Chairman of the Generalitat Valenciana, Ximo Puig, traveled to Madrid this morning to participate in a conference focused on European funds. During the day, he reflected on the results from the 28th of May, describing them as very disappointing. Nevertheless, when questioned about the Valencia Socialist movement’s readiness for the upcoming meeting, Puig indicated that the goal remains to position the party as the leading force, signaling an ambition to secure a majority. He emphasized that the outcomes achieved in the Community represented the best performance since 2007, framing them as evidence of progress under Botànic policies and a testament to the region’s ongoing political work.
Puig also spoke about possibilities for the future, noting that a return to certain political configurations is always possible, though not easy. He tied this to recent data on unemployment and other indicators that he views as supportive of Botànic’s economic and social agenda. The Valencian socialist leader underscored the importance of broad political backing for the current government, arguing that favorable indicators should quiet fears and that the country often faces noise and misperceptions that obscure the underlying realities. He stressed that stability rests on solid, tangible data rather than rhetoric.
Looking ahead, Puig argued that discussions about Spain’s future should be grounded in a clear, straightforward choice: the path offered by the Socialist Party. He framed the forthcoming period as one where calm, principled dialogue could guide decisions that affect the nation’s trajectory. The emphasis remained on constructive governance rather than sensational headlines, and Puig pressed for a pragmatic approach focused on governance outcomes rather than partisan theatrics.
Reflecting on recent political dynamics, Puig expressed disappointment with what he described as an excessive, football-styleization of politics within Valencia’s leadership circles. He criticized this trend as inappropriate and counterproductive, arguing that it diminishes serious policy debate and strategic planning at a time when the region needs steady, evidence-based leadership. This critique highlighted a preference for substantive debate over media-driven theatrics as the region navigates its economic and social challenges.