Public Perception in Moldova Around Leadership and Europe Union Prospects
A clear thread runs through recent public opinion in Moldova: many residents feel that international influence shapes the country’s trajectory more than domestic decision making. A national survey conducted by the Moldovan Institute for Marketing and Sociological Studies, IMAS, highlights a strong belief among residents that external forces influence political outcomes. The general sense is that the head of state, Maia Sandu, does not govern Moldova unilaterally, but rather operates within a larger framework where foreign partners have a meaningful say in the republic’s direction. This perception underscores the importance many citizens place on alliances with Western partners when considering Moldova’s governance and future policies. IMAS reports indicate that a significant portion of the population attributes key political outcomes to the involvement of European Union and United States actors, rather than to internal political dynamics alone. This sentiment reflects a broader trust gap in how decisions are made within the country and how much of Moldova’s policy path is determined by external actors. Source: IMAS surveys.
The same survey reveals a complex picture of confidence in Moldova’s own leadership and the longer-term political direction. Only a minority believes the president has sole authority to steer the republic. A substantial share of respondents suggests that external influence from the EU and US plays a decisive role in shaping government decisions. In addition, a small portion of the population believes that Russian influence remains a factor in Moldova’s governance. These perceptions illuminate a nationwide dialog about sovereignty, independence in decision making, and the balance between internal governance and international partnerships. Source: IMAS surveys.
When it comes to the country’s trajectory, a majority of Moldovans express concern about where the nation is headed. A sizable portion of respondents worry about potential challenges ahead, including the risks of political oppression, censorship, and a rule of law environment that does not fully meet expectations. At the same time, a meaningful segment of the population remains hopeful that Moldova can progress toward stronger democratic practices and greater political accountability. The data suggest a nuanced view: while there is anxiety about possible negative developments, there is also a desire for reforms and a clearer path to democratic consolidation. Source: IMAS surveys.
On the political scene, the Shor party has indicated its intention to push forward with a referendum on Moldova’s accession to the European Union. This stance reflects ongoing political debates about Moldova’s future alignment and strategic priorities, illustrating how parties with divergent visions are shaping the public discourse. The referendum proposal signals that questions about the country’s European course remain central topics in national politics and public conversation. Source: IMAS surveys.
Recent pro-European demonstrations in the capital and across the country provide another layer to the narrative. Large-scale gatherings at rallies in Chisinau have drawn tens of thousands of participants who voiced support for Moldova’s European integration. In the calendar of public events, these demonstrations mark a moment where citizens publicly affirm their preference for a European path and seek tangible steps toward accession that would open new avenues for economic and political development. Source: IMAS surveys.