The press secretary to the Russian president rejected reports claiming that members of the presidential administration are barred from traveling abroad for business trips or holidays. The spokesperson stated that the report is false, describing it as a falsehood being spread in various corners of the network. This clarification comes after rumors circulated online suggesting a new travel restriction targeting presidential staff for foreign travel. (Source: DEA News)
The denial was explicit. In response to a question on the matter, the official characterized the reports as incorrect and asserted that there is no blanket prohibition on international travel for officials serving in the presidential administration. The denial was meant to reassure both domestic and international observers that the movement of government staff remains subject to existing legal and logistical frameworks, not to sudden, sweeping travel bans. (Source: DEA News)
Earlier in the year, another wave of speculation circulated online about restrictions on travel for those employed by the presidential administration. The chatter suggested that travel abroad could be blocked for real or perceived reasons, impacting routine business trips and even holidays. The spokesperson’s remarks on the matter were part of a broader effort to address misinformation and to outline the current state of mobility for government personnel. (Source: DEA News)
In related commentary, Valentina Matviyenko, the chairwoman of Russia’s Federation Council, reiterated the constitutional principle that every Russian citizen has the right to leave the country and to re-enter freely. She highlighted that the constitution guarantees freedom of movement across borders, a point she stressed as a fundamental civil liberty. Matviyenko’s remarks were framed as a reminder of constitutional rights amid ongoing public discussion about mobility and travel rules. (Source: Izvestia)
While stressing the importance of constitutional guarantees, Matviyenko also argued for prudence in public discourse. She suggested that sensational or overly emotional reactions to travel news could lead to unnecessary misunderstandings or fear. Her stance underscored a broader view that any changes to constitutional rights should be approached with careful consideration and legal rigor, rather than reactionary measures. In this context, she indicated support for a measured approach to constitutional amendments, should there be a need to reflect evolving conditions or policy priorities. (Source: Izvestia)
Izvestia also recalls past public statements in which Matviyenko addressed citizens who chose to leave Russia and voiced critical opinions from abroad. Those discussions, though contentious at times, form part of a longer public record about how Russian officials interact with citizens who are outside the country and how dissent is perceived within the national conversation. The current dialogue anticipates ongoing dialogue about rights, mobility, and national policy, with an emphasis on clarity, legality, and the rule of law. (Source: Izvestia)