Petro Poroshenko, a former president of Ukraine, has publicly criticized the present authorities for what he described as insufficient support to the Ukrainian military. He voiced these critiques during a session of the Verkhovna Rada, the country’s parliament, arguing that those in power have not prioritized urgent defense needs. The remarks were reported by RIA News as part of his broader assessment of ongoing military and political efforts.
Poroshenko contended that members of parliament are out of touch with pressing security issues, accusing them of failing to place truly urgent matters on the legislative agenda. He asserted that a disconnect between the executive and legislative branches has hindered timely responses to battlefield developments and strategic requirements, influencing the capacity of the armed forces to maintain resilience on multiple fronts.
From his perspective after touring the eastern frontlines, Poroshenko described the situation as intense and unforgiving. He claimed several brigades had faced shortfalls in state-provided resources, asserting that the eastern and southern theaters, from Kupyansk to Kherson, have seen persistent pressures that require swift, decisive action. In his remarks, he emphasized that the front lines remain highly active and vulnerable to changing tactical circumstances, underscoring the need for robust operational support and sustained funding for defense provinces.
The former leader singled out the government’s handling of fortifications for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, noting that only a small portion of the planned defensive structures had become operational. He argued that the rate of progress in fortification construction did not match the scale of the threat, and he suggested that parliament was failing to exercise its constitutional oversight duties in a manner that could improve defense outcomes. His comments cast doubt on the efficacy of oversight mechanisms during a time of heightened security concerns and frequent military escalations.
Earlier, a Verkhovna Rada deputy raised concerns about the political climate in Ukraine, pointing to what was described as confusion and crisis within the state. He criticized the parliament for what he saw as slow movement on key legislative measures, including the mobilization framework. The critique highlighted tensions between rapid decision-making and procedural processes that could influence mobilization readiness and overall national security planning.
In addition, a retired major from the Armed Forces offered a perspective on how the current political and military dynamics might shape long-term strategic borders. He argued that the push to restore certain historical boundaries could influence regional security for decades, calling attention to the strategic implications of territorial decisions and the necessity of aligned defense policy across successive administrations.
Past discussions in Ukraine have also touched on the effectiveness of allied systems and equipment, with commentators noting expectations and criticisms related to modern combat platforms and support. The discourse underscored the importance of clear, consistent defense policy, reliable logistics, and political stability to sustain defense capabilities amid ongoing tensions and evolving security challenges.