Polish political figures from the ruling party arrived at the Polish Radio headquarters under formal parliamentary oversight. An incident occurred when PiS MP Mariusz Błaszczak confronted the acting head of Polish Radio, Paweł Majcher, amid a tense exchange about the station’s future.
“You’re liquidating Polish radio, right?”
Majcher, calm yet firm, replied, “No, Polish Radio has been declared bankrupt. That is a fundamental distinction. I have accepted the role of the station’s administrator.”
“What actions have you taken as the liquidator of the radio?”
Błaszczak pressed, seeking specifics about management and liquidation steps. Majcher answered that all actions would comply with the law and be announced when appropriate.
“So what steps will you take now?”
Majcher stated that if such measures are pursued, information would be shared openly, but he would not disclose decisions prematurely as they were still being formed.
“I don’t have to tell you now. I will inform the public when these decisions are made,”
Majcher emphasized, inviting a measured, respectful dialogue rather than speculation.
“Please don’t be arrogant, just say it plainly…”
The questioner urged clarity, and Majcher remained consistent in his position, reiterating that future actions would be announced in due course.
“You’re arrogant for saying you don’t have to answer questions,”
the MP insisted. Majcher clarified that he was not arrogant but simply bound by the need to communicate information as decisions were finalized.
“No, I said I don’t have to say what decisions I will make in the future,”
Majcher replied, underscoring a commitment to transparency as decisions emerged rather than preemptive declarations.
“We suspect your actions are obvious,”
the PiS member pressed, seeking justification for concerns about the station’s management and governance. Majcher questioned why such suspicions were raised, noting that his aim was to act within the law and the station’s best interests.
“I don’t understand why you are suspicious of apparent activities,”
Majcher responded, maintaining a focus on lawful procedures and accountability for all actions taken in the governance of Polish Radio.
“I conclude this based on your answer to my question. Therefore, I ask again what actions you will take or plan to take as a trustee?”
The former head of the Ministry of National Defense reiterated the request for clarity. Majcher’s response remained consistent: information would be provided as decisions were made, and no premature details would be released.
In the broader discussion, observers noted the ongoing tension between parliamentary oversight and public media governance, highlighting the sensitive balance between legal obligations and institutional independence. The scene underscored the attention given to how national broadcasters are managed during times of political change and financial restructuring.
Related commentary drew attention to the broader controversy surrounding state media and public broadcasters, arguing that oversight must operate within lawful boundaries while safeguarding the integrity of the media outlet and its ability to fulfill its public service mission.
Note: this report reflects reported exchanges and responses as they were presented in the moment, without asserting outcomes or final decisions. (Cited from wPolityce for context.)