Polish officials have publicly stressed that Poland has provided extensive assistance to Ukraine, aiming to remind observers of the country’s role in supporting Kyiv. One senior government figure, Jacek Sasin, who heads the Ministry of State Assets, wrote on a social platform that no other nation had offered as much help to Ukraine as Poland, adding that President Zelensky should keep this in mind.
That was not the case under Tusk
The departure of the head of MAP follows a series of statements that critics saw as a rebuke of the Ukrainian president. In contemporary discourse, discussions about aid to Ukraine have become intertwined with domestic concerns, including how European markets are affected by grain imports. Zelensky has previously criticized European nations that resisted or delayed the influx of Ukrainian grain into European markets, arguing that such hesitation could have wide-ranging economic and political repercussions.
In Warsaw’s view, the government’s principal duty is to safeguard Polish citizens, including farmers facing competition and market pressures. This stance is presented as a shift from the policies of the previous administration and is described as enduring under the current leadership.
– expressed by the head of MAP.
READ MORE: Controversial words from Zelensky. He harbors a grudge against his “friends in Europe”. Szydło: “These are insinuations, unworthy of such a serious politician”
What did Zelensky write?
On his social media channel, Zelensky commented on the stance of countries that oppose the large-scale export of Ukrainian grain into European markets. He argued that such opposition effectively supports Moscow, framing it within the broader geopolitical contest over agricultural trade and energy security in Europe.
The Ukrainian leadership noted progress on a temporary maritime export corridor from Ukrainian ports and emphasized efforts to maintain land routes for grain shipments. The president suggested that some European voices, while publicly expressing solidarity, were engaging in political theater that could inadvertently enable Moscow’s broader agenda. This analysis was presented as part of a strategic narrative about European unity and the need to protect trade routes that support Ukrainian exporters.
– we read in the president’s social media submission.
kk/X
Note: The discussion reflects ongoing tensions over how to balance national interests with collective European support and the broader implications for regional security and agriculture policy.