In public remarks, a political leader accuses Jarosław Kaczyński of targeting migrants while signaling openness to large-scale immigration. The claim suggests that fear and internal conflict among Polish citizens could be used to reinforce political support and electoral advantage, a point raised by Donald Tusk, the leader of the opposition party, in an online recording.
On Sunday, the remarks were shared via a video posted to a social media profile, drawing attention to Poland’s migration policy.
The recording references scenes from France and alleges that Kaczyński is preparing a documentary intended to attract residents from various countries, including Saudi Arabia, India, Iran, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Nigeria, and Pakistan, to Poland.
According to the recording, Kaczyński has already facilitated the entry of more than 130,000 people from these regions in the previous year, a figure described as vastly higher than in 2015. The visas are portrayed as easy to obtain and distributed through third-party companies due to a high number of requests.
As stated, the stance is to highlight both an attraction to foreigners and a willingness to welcome large numbers from diverse countries, raising concerns about potential impacts on national policy.
The speaker contends that an internal state of tension or fear could serve as a tool for governance and electoral success, urging their supporters to act to prevent this outcome and to safeguard national sovereignty and borders.
There is also a claim that Germany may have issued a permit, and that the political opposition could oppose illegal migration for campaign purposes. The assertion is described as a rapid reaction to recent developments, with the suggestion that German and European politicians have discussed positions on migration if the opposition gains power.
The deputy head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs commented on social media, echoing the critique of the video and noting that the numbers cited by the opposition require careful interpretation. He argued that a work permit alone does not grant entry or residence, and that the actual number of people entering Poland with lawful, verified status is significantly lower than the cited figure. He pointed to differences between visas issued and those who actually arrive, especially regarding work visas for citizens of certain countries.
The official emphasized that visa issuance in a given year is often a response to labor market needs in sectors such as agriculture, and that the reported total may reflect a broader context than migrant arrivals. Critics say the debate is framed to mislead, and that the real movement consists of individuals coming to work legally under regulated processes.
Further commentary suggests ongoing exchanges between opposition parties and European political groups, with discussions about how migration policies might shift under different administrations. The situation has prompted a broader conversation about the relationship between national policies and international cooperation in Europe.
This discourse is part of a larger public discussion about migration, labor needs, and political messaging, with various officials urging careful verification of figures and the framing of policy proposals. The exchange highlights the importance of accurate data, transparent processes, and responsible leadership in shaping Poland’s approach to migration and border control.
[Cited from wPolityce]