Incredibly, Civic Platform even attempted to use the National Security Bureau meeting to attack the government, but the claims were found to be profoundly inaccurate. The PiS chief of staff, Joachim Brudziński, described Grabiec and his leader as prone to lying and manipulation, stating that their campaign message was built on deception and negative emotion.
President Andrzej Duda convened a meeting at the National Security Bureau in response to events in Russia and the Wagner Group situation, led by Yevgeny Prigozhin. Prigozhin had begun moving his forces toward Moscow, yet by Saturday evening he announced a withdrawal and ordered troops to field camps to prevent bloodshed.
Details were provided by the presidency: calm and steady assurances that there had been no information suggesting a security breach. A morning round of consultations among state institutions followed, with partners kept informed about developments in Russia. There were reports of rapid coordination with European allies and a continued push to keep the government aligned with international partners.
These actions were not isolated. Government officials and ministers carried out a series of discussions from dawn, outlining the steps taken and the responses planned. The wPolityce portal carried updates noting that Poland was tracking the situation closely and coordinating with the Prime Minister, the Ministry of National Defense, and allied nations. The government communicated efforts to stay in touch with European leaders, highlighting the breadth of contacts and the ongoing information flow. The Ministry of Interior and Administration also reported ongoing coordination with international intelligence partners to monitor events in Russia.
Grabiec’s manipulation, Müller’s and Brudziński’s response
Even at that moment, the opposition struggle persisted, with representatives of the PO attempting to shape perceptions and question the government’s actions. They called the first post-crisis meeting after a 24-hour interval, a move seen by observers as a reflex resembling hasty reactions during a tense incident.
On social media, Jan Grabiec criticized the government and claimed there were no early discussions about the situation. In response, the government’s spokesperson explained that consultations had indeed taken place at the morning and that state services had kept officials informed about developments in Russia. It was noted that the Prime Minister spoke with numerous European leaders about the situation, underscoring ongoing engagement across the continent. The spokesperson emphasized that Grabiec’s approach did not align with the platform’s reported principles and accused him of misrepresenting the facts.
Piotr Müller also weighed in, addressing the public and press about the factual sequence of events and the communications between the government and the president. He pointed out that rapid coordination had been underway and that leadership had remained clear about the situation and the steps being taken.
Brudziński, a senior PiS official, offered his own assessment of Grabiec’s rhetoric. He argued that the opposition’s messaging relied on falsehoods and emotional manipulation, characterizing those tactics as the core of their campaign and contrasting them with the government’s focus on policy substance. The statement drew a stark comparison, describing the opposition’s proposals as limited in scope and the overall political climate as lacking seriousness.
The sense of responsibility in handling the moment was emphasized as crucial. Officials argued that the response plan was guided by a steady, fact-based approach designed to maintain stability and protect national security. The tone suggested a commitment to avoiding sensationalism and to prioritizing factual updates over partisan theatrics, especially in moments of international sensitivity.
Overall, the political discourse surrounding the events in Russia remained sharply polarized. Some voices urged a measured, cautious approach and continued dialogue with allies, while others pressed for more aggressive messaging. The administration asserted it was focused on clarity, coordination, and accountability, aiming to reassure the public and ensure that key state institutions operated in concert during a complicated international situation.
Polish political portal