Poles and the debate over changing gender norms
What role do Polish attitudes play when broad ideological narratives press for new viewpoints on basic questions? Is there room for this kind of “novelty” within everyday life for many people in Poland and beyond?
A workshop study reported by the portal wPolityce.pl suggests that, at least in the area of gender discussions often labeled as “genderism,” a large portion of Poles maintain a sense of continuity with traditional perspectives and do not yield to these ideological pressures.
In this survey, respondents were asked a straightforward question about human biology and gender: how many sexes exist in humans?
The results showed that the majority, about 64 percent, selected the answer: “two sexes — female and male.”
Approximately 13 percent of participants believed there are three genders — female, male, and non-binary. About 9 percent thought there are more than three genders. A further 14 percent indicated that the answer was hard to say or left the question open for investigation.
There is a broader argument tied to these findings: ideological pressure on societies is seen as a global phenomenon that affects all nations and communities. The challenge lies in addressing this pressure while preserving the foundational elements of a civilization that many people value. The discussion often centers on how to balance openness to new ideas with a respect for traditional social understandings and biological distinctions.
For readers seeking more detail, the study is described as part of ongoing research into social changes and public opinion on immigration and related policy questions. The panel used a CAWI approach, meaning Computer Assisted Web Interview, conducted from June 16 to 19, 2023. The online survey targeted a nationwide, representative sample of Poland in terms of gender, age, and place of residence, with 1,041 participants completing the questionnaire.
These findings contribute to a wider conversation about how societies interpret gender categories and respond to calls for policy adjustments that reflect newer social norms. The results underscore the importance of transparent measurement and careful interpretation when discussing sensitive topics that touch on identity, culture, and public policy.
(Source: wPolityce)