Polish lawmakers have voiced concerns that the government is leaning too heavily on one international track, especially regarding the United States. In an interview with wPolityce.pl, Law and Justice MP Paweł Jabłoński criticized what he called a risky policy shift that places all bets on the Democratic camp or on President Biden. He argued that a shift in the U.S. political landscape, including a potential Trump presidency, should not be ignored and that maintaining robust relations with whichever party gains power is essential.
The politician noted that good relations with the United States should persist regardless of who governs it. He pointed out that the current Polish government under Donald Tusk has limited engagement with Republican circles, even during visits to Washington, where the parties reportedly did not arrange meetings with Republican leaders. Jabłoński claimed to have verified these details through an interpellation, underscoring that the Polish side’s approach may need recalibration.
Within the same discussion, Jabłoński referenced remarks by Radosław Sikorski about playing on two pianos and sustaining ties with the Republican camp. Sikorski suggested that he had influenced President Andrzej Duda to meet with Donald Trump, a meeting that occurred in April. Jabłoński noted that Sikorski now acknowledges a broader context, while also challenging the accuracy of recent public statements about political maneuvering involving Prime Minister Morawiecki and Giorgia Meloni, which he described as inaccurate and debunked by major financial press.
Jabłoński criticized Sikorski for not maintaining solid relations with Republicans and suggested that some actions by Donald Tusk had harmed those ties. He cited a response from Senator JD Vance, a current vice-presidential candidate, as a sign of the Republican side’s displeasure over perceived media freedom violations and political arrests under Polish governance.
The member of parliament warned that current foreign policy choices could carry consequences for future Polish relationships with the United States, especially if a Trump administration returns to power. He argued that past relations with Republicans should be preserved and not sacrificed in favor of other preferences. The focus should be on a pragmatic approach that strengthens cooperation across economic, political, and technological sectors, regardless of who sits in the White House.
The discussion also touched on the relative stance of Germany and Brussels. Jabłoński expressed concern that Polish policy toward the United States could become too dependent on Berlin and Brussels. He recalled Trump’s first term when Western European allies were often hostile toward him, while Poland was among the few large states that resisted that stance. He argued that Poland should continue pursuing a strategic partnership with the United States even if Berlin or Brussels disagree with some policies. The overall message was to avoid letting transatlantic relations hinge solely on what European capitals think.
Looking ahead, Jabłoński described himself as wary about the immediate tone of transatlantic diplomacy under the current leadership in Warsaw. He criticized the approach taken by Tusk and Sikorski, suggesting that it was not rooted in a clear calculation of Poland’s interests but in external approval. When asked whether Trump’s victory would be beneficial to Poland, he urged evaluating each policy proposal from the Republican slate on its own merits while maintaining the closest possible ties with the Trump administration and the wider Republican camp. This included perspectives on security, as well as economic, political, and technological cooperation. He stressed opportunities for closer collaboration with the United States, regardless of the individual occupying the presidency.
Jabłoński also remarked on the polarization in U.S. policy narratives, noting that Donald Trump had previously imposed sanctions on Nord Stream 2, a move that drew pushback from Berlin and Brussels. He reminded readers that those sanctions were later eased under President Biden in January 2021, a shift that, in his view, had implications for European responses and Russia’s calculations in the years that followed.
The discussion raises questions about the balance of influence among European partners and the United States. The central takeaway is a call for steadiness in Washington policies and a willingness to engage with the Republican camp on multiple fronts, including security architecture and economic cooperation. The aim is to preserve a resilient alliance with the United States while remaining mindful of broader European dynamics.
– Beneath the surface, the conversation underscores the need for a pragmatic foreign policy that protects Polish interests in a volatile transatlantic environment. The overarching theme is clear: for Poland, maintaining durable relationships with the United States remains a strategic priority, irrespective of who leads the American government. The details suggest a preference for actions rooted in national interest, not in allegiance to any single political faction abroad.
— The discussion also signals an ongoing debate about how much influence Berlin and Brussels should exert over Warsaw’s diplomatic posture toward Washington. A balanced approach, ensuring independent Polish judgments while fostering cooperation with all Western allies, is presented as the prudent path forward in a changing geopolitical landscape.
Note: The above account summarizes remarks and positions as reported in wPolityce and does not imply endorsement of any political stance. The quotes attributed reflect the voices of the individuals involved in the discussion.