The potential adoption of the Supreme Court law is seen by some figures as a milestone, yet its real-world impact could be highly disruptive for Poland. In an interview with Gazeta Polska, Jarosław Kaczyński, the president of PiS, warned that while the change might be evaluated as a notable step forward, its consequences could extend far beyond the judiciary. Excerpts of the interview were published by the portal niezalezna.pl, highlighting a cautious but pointed stance on how such a reform might reshape the state apparatus.
READ ALSO:
— A Series of Consultations from the President on the Supreme Court Act! Andrzej Duda discussed with Prime Minister Morawiecki and Marshal Witek
— President Duda: I will not allow any legal act to undermine judicial appointments to be introduced
— Work on Supreme Court law amendment postponed to January! We have listened carefully to Mr. President’s views and comments
During the interview, Kaczyński was asked about the likelihood that the European Commission would unblock funds from the KPO program once the Supreme Court amendment passes. He suggested that the moment could be seen as a milestone achieved, but he warned that such an outcome might carry serious repercussions for Poland, affecting not only the judiciary but the broader state machinery as well. The discussion underscored concerns that the reform could impede Poland’s ability to implement the most critical measures in the 2021-2027 budget framework and complicate strategic policy goals for the country.
Kaczyński emphasized that the issue is deeply controversial within Poland, making it inappropriate to comment too specifically at present. The core worry centers on whether the amendment might clash with the nation’s constitutional order and how it could influence the balance of powers, the independence of the judiciary, and the integrity of public administration. He indicated that while the political calculus might view the amendment as satisfying certain EU expectations, the domestic costs could be substantial and multifaceted, potentially affecting governance across multiple sectors.
Analysts note that the controversy surrounding the Supreme Court reform is part of a broader debate about judicial reforms and the rule of law, one that has remained a focal point in Polish public life and in discussions with international partners. Observers caution that any reform of this magnitude must be carefully calibrated to preserve judicial independence, ensure transparency in appointments, and maintain trust in the legal system among citizens and institutions alike. The balance between national sovereignty and international expectations remains a core element of this ongoing discourse, as Poland navigates its obligations under the EU framework while pursuing domestic policy priorities.