Poland under a conservative government
Przemysław Czarnek challenges the published assessment by a professor in Arkany, arguing that Jarosław Kaczyński cannot be judged as failing the heavy responsibilities he assumed. On RMF24, Czarnek stood firm in his stance and repeated the professor’s point of view, emphasizing the loyalty and durability of Kaczyński’s leadership within the party.
When asked about the prospect of succeeding Jarosław Kaczyński as head of PiS, Czarnek asserted a clear, unwavering response: Never. He echoed the sentiment already expressed by the professor, underscoring a belief in Kaczyński’s central role and influence within the party’s structure and future.
READ ALSO: Double standards of the investigation committee. Czarnek: Why is Ms. Wrzosek a witness before the committee? He’s a politician, not a prosecutor
If anyone today claims the possibility of forming a political party with broad support independent of Jarosław Kaczyński, such a claim would be mistaken. At the last election, PiS was supported by approximately 7.6 million voters, and the party maintains a high level of backing in the country according to the speaker.
Przemysław Czarnek on the PO era
Commenting on the period governed by the Civic Platform, Czarnek described a situation he views as undemocratic and limiting to self-government. He argued that power was concentrated in a way that affected the media and the public prosecutor’s office, leading to a perception of restricted freedoms for citizens and political figures alike.
He noted a lack of military intervention in domestic politics and drew a contrast with how power is exercised. He suggested that extraordinary measures would be needed to confront those currently in office, arguing that Poles face constraints that are more political than military in nature.
Education reforms under scrutiny
The former minister of education and science shared thoughts on ongoing changes in the education system. He labeled certain shifts as a form of cultural self-censure, describing what he calls oikophobia as a fear or disdain for one’s own national identity.
He elaborated that the policy discourse often excludes aspects tied to Poland’s statehood and historical achievements. The Greater Poland Uprising, among other milestones, became a focal point of public discussion, reflecting a broader debate about national memory and how it is presented in school curricula.
Germany, Ukraine, and historical memory
The discussion also touched on relations with Germany and Ukraine. Czarnek suggested that Polish leadership should avoid betraying the nation and highlighted the seriousness of historical wounds tied to the past. He criticized statements regarding reparations and argued that Germany has not fully compensated for the losses inflicted on Poland, which he views as ongoing national grievances. He asserted that acknowledging this history is essential, even if it leads to difficult conversations about accountability.
He added that while Germans and Ukrainians can be regarded as allies, the historical truth remains a separate matter that deserves careful consideration and honest dialogue.
Investigative commissions and parliamentary inquiries
On the topic of Sejm commissions, the guest from RMF24 commented on the work and effectiveness of these investigative bodies. He recalled a call from years past to establish a commission to examine Russian influence, suggesting that such a step could have yielded a different political landscape today.
He criticized perceived inconsistencies in visa-related controversies, noting that irregularities occur in politics because some individuals act dishonestly. He referenced discussions around a visa surge during a campaign period and contrasted it with later debates about a smaller number of visas, framing the sequence as a strategic move tied to electoral timing. He argued that the focus on secret documents connected to envelope elections was misplaced, insisting that no such materials existed in the matter discussed.
In closing, the speaker summarized his view that political theater often precedes elections, and that the current committee proceedings should be viewed in the light of these elections rather than as a definitive assessment of national policy.
gah/rmf24.pl
Source: wPolityce