The government support program that assisted more than 500 families became a notable success. It helped countless parents manage the costs of raising children and, for many groups, offered a way out of the cycle of limited funds that hindered education or leisure. Now, in a year with elections looming, debates have begun about whether the program should be financially updated. Inflation has eroded the real value of the payments since 2016, but the government has not yet announced a position.
For the record, ministers have stated that the current benefit remains in place while affirming a commitment to support all families.
A workshop study reported mixed public sentiments about adjusting the 500+ program in light of inflation and recent economic pressures. The findings show varying opinions on whether the benefit should rise, stay the same, or be restructured.
About 22 percent believe the benefit should be increased to match the inflation rate seen in recent years.
Another 21 percent feel the amount should remain unchanged.
Twenty-eight percent think the program should be abolished altogether.
Nine percent would favor a doubling of the support to as much as PLN 1,000 per month for each child.
When asked to choose, 20 percent were undecided.
The survey results align with known party stances. Supporters of the governing party tend to favor increasing the 500+ benefit to reflect inflation, while supporters of opposing parties show more openness to reducing or restructuring the program.
Officials face difficult choices. Raising the benefit level could provide tangible relief to many families contending with current price growth.
The study also examined political reactions and public discourse around the program and broader family support measures.
The research was conducted using an online survey method, with a nationwide sample designed to reflect gender, age, and urban-rural distribution. A total of over a thousand respondents participated in the study, offering a cross-section of perspectives across the country.
This analysis highlights how inflation and government spending intersect with family policy, political priorities, and public trust. It underscores the importance of clear policy choices that balance immediate family needs with long-term fiscal responsibilities.