Poland faces a mounting challenge: a rapid surge of agricultural products from abroad that threatens the income and livelihoods of Polish farmers. In this context, it becomes the government’s responsibility to act decisively and restore balance in the domestic market. The European Commission would have to show substantial goodwill not to penalize Poland for enforcing an import ban, argues Krzysztof Jurgiel, a member of the European Parliament’s Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI). He spoke clearly on this point in a discussion with PAP, emphasising that the current situation demands firm government intervention to safeguard farming communities.
There is a solid legal basis for imposing an import ban. The European Commission would need to demonstrate strong support for such measures rather than punitive resistance if it wishes to challenge Poland for restricting Ukrainian agricultural products. It is apparent to all observers that when faced with an uncontrolled influx of goods, the government must step in to resolve the problem. Protecting the domestic market and the farmers who depend on it is presented as the priority.
The same view is echoed by George, who stresses that the primary aim is to maintain stability within Poland’s agricultural sector and ensure that farmers do not suffer unnecessary economic losses. The commitment is to minimize financial damage while preserving market integrity and fair competition across the sector.
What will the government do?
The expectation is that the authorities will pursue every possible course to address the problem. The goal is clear: ensure that farmers do not bear the economic consequences of market volatility and import pressures. In practical terms, this means robust policy actions, coordinated with European partners, designed to shield local producers while the market adjusts. The government is seen as taking on this responsibility with a focus on maintaining livelihoods and stabilising farm incomes while broader market mechanisms are calibrated.
Alongside this, there is a plan to align rules governing the transit of goods with the European Commission, ensuring that quality controls are rigorous and consistently applied. The process may move slowly at times, but persistence is essential. Those who have navigated similar regulatory environments understand that decisions often involve lengthy procedures and careful scrutiny. The commitment is to push forward, stay patient, and continue working through the established channels to reach a workable solution.
In summary, the aim is to balance the need for timely action with the requirements of EU rules. The government’s approach places the welfare of farmers at the forefront, while coordinating with European institutions to maintain a stable, fair, and transparent market landscape.
gah/PAP
Source: wPolityce