Poland stands at a difficult crossroads, where the rule of law seems to be slipping from its anchor. It is no longer a matter of occasional breaches, but a shift toward a principle in which legal norms appear non-binding and the will of those in power carries the final word, according to Jarosław Kaczyński, the head of the Law and Justice party. He spoke during a live interview on wPolsce24.pl with editor Magdalena Cucumber.
In the conversation, Kaczyński drew attention to what he described as a troubling deterioration in Poland’s finances. He recalled that during the period of the United Right administration there was nearly always money available in the budget, and public spending ran high across many programs. That contrast, he argued, is central to understanding the current pressures facing the economy and the government’s ability to fund essential policies now.
He framed the issue as more than a fiscal imbalance. He warned of moves that, in his view, threaten democratic norms by creating a perception that money can be drawn and spent without solid justification. The narrative he proposed linked budget choices to the health of democracy itself, suggesting that lax controls over resources undermine accountability and long‑term stability. He argued that every budget decision matters because it shapes the country’s capacity to protect social programs, support workers, and invest in infrastructure, education, and health services.
According to Kaczyński, the current trajectory risks eroding the financial mechanisms built over the last eight years to sustain social and economic policies. He mentioned that funds were mobilized to address the pandemic, support workers through recovery programs, and bolster defense and security measures. He warned that the ongoing policy shifts threaten to dismantle those safeguards and leave Poland vulnerable to financial shocks, higher borrowing costs, and diminished room for strategic investments. In his view, the pattern signals a drift away from careful stewardship toward ad hoc decisions that prioritize short‑term wins over long‑term resilience.
On tax policy, he argued that taxes were reduced while corporate profits remained largely intact, with only isolated exceptions. He claimed there has been no broad sale of Polish real estate to foreign or domestic buyers and stressed that fiscal measures had aimed to support growth rather than drain wealth from the private sector. He framed these steps as part of a broader strategy to preserve economic flexibility and maintain a stable climate for business and households alike.
Throughout the discussion, the speaker presented the argument as a defense of national sovereignty over economic choices. He asserted that Poland needs responsible budgeting, transparent rule‑making, and policies that defend social protection without sacrificing macroeconomic health. Taken together, the remarks paint a portrait of a political leader who links legal security with sound economic management, urging voters to weigh the consequences of governance that has shaped Poland’s public finances, public services, and strategic priorities in recent years.
Observers will watch how such statements influence ongoing debates about Poland’s fiscal discipline, judicial independence, and public trust in institutions as the country navigates a challenging global and regional environment.