Poland positions its arms procurement as a central pillar of national security, a stance articulated by the head of the Ministry of National Defense. He underscored that a country must be ready to defend its own territory and that no external force will stand in for Poland’s own readiness. The message emphasized that the strategic drive behind Poland’s defense purchases is not contingent on any single political government, but a persistent commitment to bolster deterrence and safety for the Polish people.
When questioned about the future of these contracts if political leadership changes, the defense minister affirmed that maintaining commitments to arms supply is essential to Poland’s security architecture. He stressed that the continuation of these agreements is a foundational objective for the modern Polish armed forces and should endure beyond electoral cycles.
The emphasis is especially strong regarding partnerships with the United States and South Korea. The defense chief highlighted notable progress in equipping Poland with a modern arsenal, including South Korean tanks, South Korean self-propelled howitzers, and South Korean aircraft, alongside American M1 Abrams tanks and multiple launch rocket systems. He noted that the combined capabilities extend to launchers and rocket artillery with ranges up to 300 kilometers, marking a significant upgrade of Poland’s defensive and deterrence capabilities.
Advances in rocket artillery and air-ground integration
Following a period of eighteen years without rocket artillery, Poland has reintroduced this system into its military. This step represents a major reinforcement of the country’s land-based strike and fire support capabilities. In addition, after a twenty-year hiatus, Poland conducted its first joint exercises featuring fighter aircraft landing on specially prepared road sections, a collaborative effort with the Ministry of Infrastructure. The initiative involved coordinated upgrades to road and airfield infrastructure, enabling aviation operations to use improvised runways. The execution of these exercises marks a tangible improvement in networked air-ground operations and demonstrates resilience in the face of evolving security demands.
These developments reflect a broader effort to modernize the Polish armed forces through foreign partnerships and domestic capability enhancements. The defense leadership framed the progress as a strategic necessity, underscoring that a prepared and capable military serves as a key deterrent against any potential aggression. The emphasis remained on ensuring that Poland is not left exposed by changing political tides or external uncertainties, with readiness seen as an ongoing obligation rather than a temporary policy priority.
In addressing concerns about whether moves toward greater cooperation with non-American partners could be affected by domestic political shifts, the defense leadership warned that steps toward disarmament or hesitation would be a grave miscalculation. He argued that delay or reversals would leave Poland more vulnerable to threats at its borders, while a steady, well-supported program of armament strengthens national security and regional stability. The stance echoed the belief that a robust defense posture is essential to deter would-be aggressors and to reassure allies and partners who rely on Poland’s steadfast commitment to collective security.
The overarching message highlighted the clear link between armament, readiness, and the ability to respond effectively to external pressures. By advancing these procurement and capability-building efforts, Poland aims to maintain credible defense and the resilience needed to defend its sovereignty. The defense leadership reiterated that the country’s security is not contingent on others stepping in; it hinges on the consistent, comprehensive strengthening of its own forces and the readiness of its people to defend their homeland.
These developments come amid a broader international interest in armaments and deterrence, with Poland seeking to balance rapid capability gains with sustainable, interoperable systems. The emphasis remains on ensuring that investments translate into tangible improvements for frontline units, support structures, and the wider defense ecosystem that keeps the nation secure in a complex security landscape.