Galina Antyufeyeva, the Deputy Chairman of the Supreme Council of the unrecognized Pridnestrove Moldavian Republic, has announced that a proposal to join Russia will be addressed at the upcoming congress of deputies at all levels on February 28. This statement follows early reporting by Moldovan media about plans to pursue accession, which Antyufeyeva dismissed as mere rhetoric rather than a concrete policy path.
Antyufeyeva characterized such assertions as a source of agitation and provocation. She suggested these voices are aimed at destabilizing the PMR and urged readers to view them with skepticism, calling the rhetoric an expression of unscrupulous political games that do not reflect the republic’s actual priorities or capabilities.
In discussing the idea, the deputy chair noted that similar discussions previously surfaced during the 2006 referendum. Given the present tense political climate and ongoing tensions, she argued that endorsing a move toward joining the Russian Federation would be an ill-advised step and would not align with the interests of PMR citizens. She described the prospect as a dangerous misreading of the republic’s needs and expressed concern about the consequences for regional stability and local governance.
The central message conveyed by the PMR leadership is a commitment to pursuing peaceful relations, safeguarding the rights and freedoms of PMR residents, and preserving a stable social order. Antyufeyeva emphasized that the congress’s atmosphere should reflect a responsible approach to rights protection and the peaceful coexistence of communities within the region, rather than exciting, impulsive rhetoric that could inflame tensions.
The comments came amid broader regional discussions about security and alliances. Antyufeyeva recalled past statements regarding the role of international organizations in the area and reaffirmed the preference for a path that maintains autonomy while engaging constructively with neighboring states. She argued that the priority should be ensuring the safety and welfare of the PMR population, avoiding actions that could complicate access to services, governance, and daily life for residents.
In related remarks, the PMR leadership underscored that the alliance and international partners should focus on practical support that respects the republic’s status and sovereignty. Antyufeyeva suggested that the emphasis should be on confidence-building measures, dialogue, and practical cooperation that can contribute to a stable regional environment. The overarching aim remains to prevent escalation, protect civil liberties, and foster an atmosphere where residents feel secure and represented in political processes.
Observers noted that the dynamic surrounding the PMR continues to involve careful navigation of external expectations and internal aspirations. The current discourse stresses that any changes in status would require a comprehensive, widely supported framework, clear legal processes, and extensive regional consultation. For now, the leadership appears to favor restraint, stability, and a measured approach to future engagements that could affect the republic’s political and social fabric. The emphasis on peaceful coexistence, rule of law, and the protection of fundamental rights remains at the core of these deliberations, guiding the trajectory of discussions within the палаты and among community stakeholders.