Jacek Sasin, a spokesperson for the ruling party, criticized Minister Bodnar for what he described as a chaotic disruption of the judiciary. He asserted on Radio Zet that Bodnar bears responsibility for the upheaval surrounding the Prokuratura Krajowa, arguing that no one in authority truly holds legitimate power. According to Sasin, Bodnar’s actions will lead to accountability, including the possibility of legal consequences for what he referred to as today’s events. He urged supporters to join a midday demonstration in front of the Sejm to defend Father Olszewski and to protest what he framed as government violations of the rule of law.
The former Minister of State Property condemned Bodnar’s moves, insisting they triggered disorder within the judicial system. He repeated his claim that the Prosecutor’s Office had been seized illegally and without the necessary presidential approval, underscoring his belief that the action overstepped constitutional bounds.
Sasin argued that the person occupying the national prosecutor post was not legitimately appointed. He described the current holder as a usurper and asserted that under his view, the public prosecutor’s office should operate within established legal norms. He contrasted today’s situation with a time when, in his view, public prosecutors acted within the law, free from unlawful usurpation, and he criticized what he called improper moves by the current officeholders.
The PiS member compared the present political climate to a banana republic, warning that if the country were truly upholding the rule of law, the dismissal of the national prosecutor would require presidential authorization. He stressed that no such authorization had been granted, reinforcing his belief that lawful procedures were being bypassed.
He urged participation in the Sejm protest in defense of Father Olszewski, arguing that the government’s actions—starting with the alleged takeover of media outlets and extending to the prosecutor’s office—undermine the integrity of ongoing investigations. He claimed that a fair inquiry would be difficult under the current circumstances and framed the situation as a direct challenge to democratic norms.
In discussing the broader political horizon, Sasin commented on the attacks facing Law and Justice and, specifically, on President Jarosław Kaczyński. He suggested that the circles forming the United Right should increase their cooperation, asserting that unity was necessary to withstand the political pressure from opponents. He stated that it was normal to come together in the face of aggression and that there was no reason for a split within the core coalition.
During a regional meeting in Lesser Poland, councilors reportedly decided to leave the Law and Justice ranks, a move that Sasin described with disappointment. He argued that the moment called for consolidation rather than division, noting that Poland’s interests were under attack from what he characterized as the Tusk camp. He cited a high-profile visit by a European leader as evidence of external pressure and suggested a lack of commitment to issues such as reparations, casting doubt on the opposition’s willingness to address Poland’s priorities.
Responding to a comment by Krzysztof Ardanowski about the trajectory of Jarosław Kaczyński’s leadership, Sasin acknowledged divergence of opinion within the party while defending the top leadership. He described PiS as a democratic party where diverse views are permissible, contrasting it with what he described as the more rigid style of the opposition. His remarks framed internal debate as a sign of healthy party life rather than a sign of fracture.
The future of PiS
Beyond immediate criticisms, Sasin reflected on the ongoing political debate and the resilience of Law and Justice. He voiced confidence that the party could withstand fresh attacks and highlighted a willingness to broaden cooperation with allied groups. He emphasized the importance of unity and suggested that broader coalitions could strengthen their position against adversaries who, in his view, sought to weaken Poland’s governance from within.
Looking ahead, Sasin said the party should consider the inclusion of allied communities within PiS, arguing that there was no good reason for separate political structures to stand in the way of shared goals. He reiterated his belief that consolidating forces was essential in light of external and internal pressure. He also acknowledged that disagreements would inevitably arise, yet he stressed the need for a collective approach to defend the country’s interests and uphold its constitutional framework.
In his assessment, the current climate demanded steady leadership and a clear, principled stance on matters of national sovereignty and legal process. He contended that attacks from political rivals should be met with a calm, strategic response that reinforced the integrity of Poland’s institutions. The dialogue, he maintained, should focus on safeguarding the rule of law and ensuring that the legal system operates transparently and within constitutional boundaries. The path forward, according to him, lay in unity, steadfastness, and a clear sense of purpose rooted in the country’s long-term interests.