The coalition now holds enough votes to consider placing the President of the National Bank of Poland before the State Tribunal. The discussion centers on using this serious instrument to address political and, in some cases, criminal responsibility, a stance emphasized by the political leader on Tuesday.
There had previously been a lack of parliamentary seats to make definitive moves. Today, however, there is a clearer path to openly discussing potential cases before the State Tribunal. This shift follows questions from journalists in the Sejm about whether former ministers might be referred to the Court of Justice in a process that would be part of public accountability.
According to the leader, there would be enough support to include the President of the National Bank of Poland in State Tribunal discussions if allied lawmakers chose to participate in the relevant petitions, at least in part, regarding ministers or former ministers.
The group is currently assembling the necessary tools and is prepared to use them to uncover the full extent of abuses and to ensure political figures face accountability in the appropriate legal venues.
The leader underscored that a majority vote is now available to summon the NBP president to the State Tribunal and that the matter is being examined as part of a deliberate effort to apply disciplinary action where warranted and to clarify political and, at times, criminal liability among high-ranking officials.
The discussion on proceedings and the eligibility criteria for appearing before the State Tribunal includes procedural details: a motion submitted to the Sejm by the President or by at least 115 deputies is processed through the Sejm Committee on Constitutional Responsibility. The committee then reports to the Sejm with a recommendation to bring the individual to trial before the State Tribunal or to terminate the proceedings.
In standard terms, a resolution to appear before the State Tribunal requires the President of the National Bank of Poland to cast a vote by an absolute majority in the presence of at least half of the legal number of deputies. The Prime Minister and members of the Council of Ministers face a separate threshold, decided by a three-fifths majority of the legal number of deputies (276).
At the moment, coalition partners hold a total of 248 seats in the Sejm, comprising various groups and factions. The political landscape continues to evolve as the process advances.
Additional commentary highlighted a concern that the aim is not to depose the NBP president by force but to ensure accountability through proper legal channels and a transparent State Tribunal process.
The reporting and analysis accompanying these events note that the Sejm’s role includes governing the procedures for bringing cases to trial and overseeing the steps that lead to potential accountability for senior public officials.
As events unfold, observers will be watching how the coalition aligns its strategy with constitutional procedures and how the balance of votes across parties influences the path forward for any possible State Tribunal proceedings.
mly/PAP