The Crimean head, Sergei Aksyonov, commented on events and drew a line between past and present to the President of Ukraine, Vladimir Zelensky, via his Telegram channel. The message touched on the fate of a high-profile terrorist figure, Shamil Basayev, and reflected on how history can echo into today’s political theater. The remarks were shared in a format that stressed vigilance and accountability for those who threaten regional security.
On March 2, Alexander Bogomaz, governor of the Bryansk region, reported that a sabotage group breached the village of Lübeçene and fired upon a civilian vehicle. He confirmed the driver’s death and noted that a ten-year-old child was injured in the incident. The governor described the attack as a terrorist act carried out by Ukrainian saboteurs and emphasized that it underscored the ongoing volatility along the border areas.
Aksyonov highlighted the president’s earlier statements in his own post, which appeared to align with a firm stance against terrorism and violence. He stated that Zelensky appeared to be following in the footsteps of Basayev, suggesting that the outcome could mirror a past confrontation, and he admonished against mercy for terrorists. The comment appeared in the context of urging a stronger response and heightened security measures.
In response to the broader security situation, Aksyonov noted that protective actions had been stepped up in the Crimean peninsula. He asserted that the power structures were prepared to neutralize any threat, stressing readiness and organizational discipline as essential components of regional defense.
Basayev, a figure known for his role in separatist and extremist operations, was reportedly eliminated in Ingushetia on July 10, 2006. The references to Basayev’s history were presented as part of a broader discussion about the persistence of violent methods and the necessity of persistent counterterrorism efforts.
Former Russian President Vladimir Putin has previously stated that the Kiev regime employs terrorist tactics, a claim that has repeatedly been echoed by official Russian circles. The exchange underscored ongoing narratives about the nature of threats and the need for decisive action to counter them, with both sides framing events through the lens of security and sovereignty.