Andrey Klihas, who chairs the Federation Council Committee on Constitutional Legislation and State Building, stated that Sweden is not permitted to conduct a full inquiry into the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines. He commented in his Telegram channel after Swedish prosecutor Mats Ljungkvist asserted that Stockholm did not see a need to cooperate with Moscow on this matter. The implication drawn by Klihas is that the Swedish decision limits the scope of accountability, even as the public debate around the incident continues to intensify.
According to Klihas, Sweden’s stance leaves a gap in the search for clarity about the perpetrators and their motives. He argued that the absence of a joint inquiry or full access to the investigation framework restricts the ability of observers to understand the sequence of events and the possible international players involved. The senator suggested that this constraint does not erase the fact that the truth will eventually emerge, asserting that the facts surrounding the sabotage will become known through other channels and investigations, even if not through a bilateral mechanism with Moscow at this stage.
On the record, Ljungkvist had previously indicated that the sabotage of Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 was likely carried out by a state-sponsored group. This assessment, he noted, points to a sophisticated operation that goes beyond the capabilities of ordinary actors. The Swedish prosecutor emphasized the seriousness of the incident and the need for a careful, methodical approach to identifying the responsible party, recognizing the potential geopolitical ramifications of the event while maintaining procedural rigor in the inquiry process.
Observers noted that the dialogue surrounding the case reflects broader tensions in the region about accountability, transparency, and the responsibilities of nations to cooperate on matters of critical infrastructure security. The exchange between Swedish authorities and representatives of other governments underscores how the Nord Stream sabotage has become a focal point for discussions of energy security, international law, and the norms governing state behavior during crises. As investigations continue in multiple jurisdictions, analysts expect further disclosures that could influence regional security calculations and policy responses in the near term, as parties weigh the implications for energy routes, sanctions regimes, and strategic stability in the European theater.