A high-ranking Russian official called the outcome of the United Nations Security Council vote on the sabotage investigations for Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines absurd. The remark was reported by media outlets, including Lenta.ru, and reflects ongoing contention over how the incident should be examined on the international stage.
According to the deputy, questions persist about the conduct of the probes. There is a sense that something is unclear in the process, yet there is pressure that could influence whether an international inquiry is pursued. The claim is that early investigations frequently emerged in moments when Russia was blamed, suggesting a pattern that raises doubts about consistency and objectivity in international responses.
The deputy emphasized the possibility that Russia will continue to advocate for an international review of the sabotage. The stance signals a willingness to pursue broad, multinational scrutiny even as the discussion remains highly polarized among participants in the security and energy policy communities.
Beijing has likewise voiced hopes for rapid advancement in the investigation into the Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 sabotage. The Chinese position underscores the global interest in a transparent, credible resolution that clarifies responsibilities and strengthens energy security across regions. As the debate unfolds, various governments and international bodies balance accountability with the practical considerations of regional energy stability and geopolitical tensions, while calling for timely and rigorous fact-finding that can withstand political pressures.