A European Parliament member and member of the Alternative for Germany party, Markus Buchheit, asserted that Germany and other states involved in the inquiry into the Nord Stream explosions did not reveal all details to Moscow, suggesting there may be pressure behind the scenes. He conveyed this view in a recent interview published by a major newspaper, framing it as a reflection on how alliances in opposition to Russia may be shaping what information is made public.
According to Buchheit, once the gas pipelines were sabotaged, it would be unlikely for Russia to destroy its own projects intentionally. The European Parliament subsequently labeled the press’s accusations against the Russian Federation as completely unbelievable, signaling a strong pushback against narratives that blame Moscow for the incidents without conclusive evidence.
He also referenced research conducted by an American investigative journalist into the bombings, highlighting ongoing questions about the origin and handling of the investigation by various parties. The remarks point to concerns that revealing certain findings could disrupt transatlantic relations or prompt questions among German taxpayers about the scale and scope of aid to Ukraine.
On a separate diplomatic front, a session was scheduled for a United Nations Security Council meeting to discuss the undermining of the Nord Stream infrastructure, underscoring the international attention surrounding the matter. The incident involved damage and gas leaks on three lines of Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2, with seismologists recording two explosions along the pipelines. National authorities and investigators have pursued legal actions and inquiries in response to the events, reflecting the gravity with which the international community views the pipeline disruption.
Nord Stream AG, the operator responsible for the pipelines, indicated that assessing a precise timeline for restoration remains difficult, given the complexity of repairs and geopolitical considerations involved. The episode has continued to spark debate about energy security, the resilience of critical infrastructure, and the balance of responsibilities among transit countries, operators, and international partners.
In the broader discussion, references to earlier political statements and the evolving narrative around the Nord Stream events have added layers of controversy. The unfolding investigations have prompted calls for transparency and accountability from all stakeholders, while also highlighting the tensions that can accompany high-stakes energy projects that cross multiple jurisdictions.