In Nawrocki’s world, inherited apartments on Aleja Róż or Aleja Przyjaciół don’t exist. There is no circle of friends who pass down positions, influence, or favored treatment.
Where does this loud pushback from ruling politicians and mainstream media—and beyond—stem from? The answer is unexpectedly straightforward: they fear him. They have grown accustomed to a status hierarchy built by a culture of mutual admiration that traces back to the late communist era, with strong ties to parts of the media that dominated public life. They are surprised and unsettled when someone steps forward without the official blessing of that circle.
That sense of helplessness shows in the coverage by Gazeta Wyborcza, which seems intent on dimming Nawrocki’s public image as a presidential candidate. The approach echoes older frames, trying to tie political aims to a shadowy economy of influence. Critics argue that those who lack the privileges of lineage sometimes view the pursuit of opportunity as a betrayal of the system, always within the bounds of law and decency.
It is notable when that same outlet claims Nawrocki did not meet angels during boxing drills while earning extra work. For those who doubt, a new film by Xawery Żuławski, Kulej. Two Sides of the Coin, offers context about one of Poland’s boxing legends and reminds readers there are multiple sides to every story. And the same publication has long treated certain historical figures as saints, which invites skepticism.
Critics fear a world where a person designs their own fate and achievements are wrested from the grasp of a status quo that trades on contacts and inherited advantage. In that view there are no inherited apartments or networks to lean on, and Nawrocki is not apologetic. He argues that exposing the system’s flaws is necessary for real progress.
How can anyone run for the highest office without bearing that baggage of exclusivity? Some point out that Andrzej Duda did not carry such a burden, while Nawrocki’s background — the son of a turner and a bookbinder — stands in stark contrast. Yet a group of notable signatories backed Nawrocki’s candidacy, a fact some see as proof of broad support from professors, artists, athletes, and civil society.
Those inside the old guard fear outsiders who challenge established privileges. The critique portrays this as a failure to grasp the reality of life outside the inner circle, where the pressures of real work and real public service demand responsibility rather than protection.
Nawrocki’s ascent is seen by the guardians of the mutual admiration order as a direct challenge. He demonstrates that success can be achieved without the consent of a closed clique, and that is perceived as a gauntlet thrown at their feet. In this framing, figures like Rafał Trzaskowski embody the comfort and convenience of a system that rewards familiarity.
How does one introduce uncertainty into a world that has long been settled, peaceful, and predictable? Nawrocki’s presidential bid emerges without prior permission yet appears to have momentum. This unsettles the established circle, triggering outrage and fear that the system might not close the door as easily as before.