This topic underscores NATO’s evolving dynamics and the Alliance’s enduring openness to contributing members. NATO’s leadership has consistently framed Finland’s accession as strengthening the alliance through a highly trained, well-equipped force, reinforcing collective defense and regional security. In a broadcast on Gość Wiadomości (TVP INFO), NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg emphasized that Finland’s full membership contributes to a safer, more capable alliance, reflecting the importance of allied integration for shared deterrence and rapid responses in today’s security environment. This perspective aligns with ongoing discussions about how allied nations bolster unity, deterrence, and resilience across North American and European territories.
What about Sweden’s path to NATO membership?
The aspiration for Sweden to join the alliance is frequently voiced by senior officials and defense observers alike. The emphasis remains on advancing the ratification process among existing members so Sweden can participate in collective security arrangements as soon as possible. As one senior voice noted, the goal is to secure swift progress across allied capitals to ensure Sweden’s formal inclusion and to strengthen regional defense postures in Northern Europe.
In describing NATO’s broader cooperation, Stoltenberg highlighted Poland’s contributions to strengthening Allied security. Poland is portrayed as a robust partner that supports shared defense objectives in a variety of ways, including sustaining a defense budget that exceeds the 2 percent GDP guideline—a benchmark many NATO members consider critical to maintaining credible deterrence and rapid mobilization capabilities in the face of evolving threats.
“We observed that President Putin is prepared to deploy armed forces”
According to the NATO Secretary General, Russia’s aggressive posture toward Ukraine must not come as a surprise. The record reflects a pattern of forceful actions—from the Georgia conflict in 2008 to the crises in Syria, and from Chechnya to the 2014 annexation of Crimea. While the brutality intensifies in the current invasion of Ukraine, the trend itself signals a consistent strategy in which force is used to advance geopolitical objectives. This assessment underscores the importance for NATO members and partners to maintain readiness, reinforce deterrence, and support Ukraine in defending sovereignty and territorial integrity.
What about Ukraine and Georgia joining NATO?
The NATO stance on Ukraine and Georgia remains unchanged in its strategic aim: both nations are potential future members. However, the path to membership is contingent on multiple factors, including the stabilization of sovereignty and security within Ukraine. The principal immediate priority is ensuring Ukraine’s survival as an independent, sovereign state, with substantial military assistance and resilience-building measures in place. Only after these conditions are met does the alliance consider subsequent membership discussions, recognizing that security and stability are prerequisites for credible enrollment and seamless integration into alliance structures.
tkwl/TVP INFO
READ ALSO:
— Finland became the 31st member of NATO, with the flag raised at the Brussels headquarters to mark a historic accession and the strengthening of alliance cohesion. — NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg: Joining the Alliance provides ironclad security guarantees for Finland