The guests on Telewizja Poland’s program Salon Journalists examined the long history of government attitudes toward the Cursed Soldiers, centering their discussion on yesterday’s National Day of Remembrance. Elżbieta Królikowska-Avis remarked that younger generations engaged with the meaning behind the Cursed Soldiers and grasped why the commemoration matters.
In the same vein, Minister Dziemianowicz-Bąk spoke during the remembrance events about the need to distinguish between what is essential and what is not. She also called Witold Pilecki a hero and cast Józef Kurowski who used the alias Ogień as a criminal figure.
The aim, as described by some participants, is to render the holiday unappealing, to diminish its importance, and to demonstrate that the state will no longer stand behind it.
Marcin Wikłó offered a succinct comment on this point.
READ ALSO: Trela asserts that the cursed figures sat in the forest rather than rebuilding their homeland. The discussion sparked a wave of online responses, with some viewers noting a dramatic profile of the issue.
Memory sine wave
Elżbieta Królikowska-Avis noted how the central authorities have treated the Cursed Soldiers over the years. She observed that the cult of the Cursed Soldiers has only recently found a strong foothold in popular culture and media.
She described a social pattern she has witnessed personally: decades of quiet on the subject followed by a pivot in 2007 when the National Day of Remembrance was established at the request of a memorial organization. This shift revealed a broad, widespread fascination with the Cursed Soldiers, particularly among younger people. The phenomenon resembled a cultural wave where stories entered music, comics, and digital games, helping a new generation understand the historical stakes involved.
Her emphasis was clear: young people embraced the narrative and grasped its significance, translating memory into contemporary cultural expressions.
The observation underscores a transformation in perception, where memory moves from obscurity to visibility, and where the public conversation expands to include diverse interpretive voices.
She also hinted at the paradox within the broader societal discourse, which often grows more intense as public memory shifts from silence to debate.
The more the memory of those times is discussed, the more it invites scrutiny of how the past should be honored and communicated in the present day.
Miłosz Manasterski contributed his perspective, noting that opposition to commemorating the Cursed Soldiers has roots in a historical lineage that traces back to segments of the Polish left connected to family and identity traditions. This backdrop adds a layer of tension to the public celebration of the holiday.
He argued that this heritage poses a serious challenge to how the holiday is perceived today. He described the event itself as potentially troubling, suggesting that the depicted imagery of unwavering patriotism may clash with current governmental and political climates. He suggested that certain compromises favored by those in power create friction with the historical narrative and with the kinds of principled resistance associated with those who fought for what they believed in.
In closing, he reflected on the enduring difficulty of reconciling different memories of the past with present political realities.
The discussion invites viewers to consider how national memory is shaped in the media age and how official commemoration interacts with public sentiment and personal recollection.
As the program concluded, a note encouraged viewers to engage with live broadcasts from Poland, highlighting that this topic remains a live, evolving conversation in the country’s political and cultural life.
READ ALSO:
The program referenced a separate commentary on how Poland honors the memory of the Accursed and how media outlets frame the discussion. It also touched on debates about the symbolism and the language used in public discourse about this history.
There were further remarks about editorial responses and the ongoing debates within Polish public life, including discussions about commemorations and the framing of memory in different public forums.
Further coverage highlighted the question of how commemorative stamps and public messages are perceived and how institutions justify changes in official symbols and narratives. The dialogue underscored the persistent, sometimes heated nature of these conversations in Polish society.
pn/Telewizja wPolsce/Youtube
Source: wPolityce