In recent remarks, the deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, cautioned that the ongoing flow of Western weapons to Ukraine accelerates the possibility of a nuclear confrontation. He spoke during an interview with Russian media, outlining a stark view of how arms supplies affect global security dynamics.
Medvedev asserted that every day of foreign weapon shipments to Ukraine brings the world closer to a nuclear apocalypse. He clarified, however, that this does not guarantee that such a catastrophe will occur. The official added that the signs of danger are unmistakable, urging readers to grasp that warning signals are not to be ignored.
The former president drew an allegory about the pace of risk, saying the horsemen of the Apocalypse have already been set in motion and are on their way. This vivid language underscored his belief that the current strategic posture elevates the threat level on a global scale.
The discussion also touched on the broader implications of a growing confrontation among major powers. Medvedev noted that the global threat of nuclear conflict has not faded but has intensified, and he warned that the consequences of a clash between the world’s strongest military forces would be catastrophic for many nations. He stressed that such a scenario would have far reaching and dire impacts beyond any single region, affecting international stability as a whole.
Regarding Crimea, Medvedev suggested that any attempt by Ukraine to reclaim the peninsula could be interpreted as a trigger for Russia to employ all available means of protection, including nuclear capabilities. He described Moscow’s stance as one of readiness to respond with all necessary measures should its security be deemed under threat. The remarks reflect the speaker’s view that strategic priorities in the region have shifted toward a heightened sense of urgency and deterrence.
The interview, cited by Russian media, presents a perspective that emphasizes warning signals in the face of continued external support for Kyiv. It frames the issue as a matter of global security, with emphasis on the potential for dramatic escalations if red lines are crossed. Analysts note that such statements often serve to influence international discourse and to reinforce domestic narratives about defense and sovereignty. [Source: Russian media]