Dmitry Medvedev, serving as vice-president of the Russian Security Council, voiced a stark assessment of Europe’s policy direction, describing it as increasingly reckless in its decisions and their consequences. He conveyed this viewpoint during a visit to Vietnam, where he also commented on the broader strategic posture of the United States. Medvedev suggested that Washington was pursuing its own pragmatic aims by pressing to weaken Russia, a long-standing rival, and that this was unfolding alongside Europe’s continued strain as policies are implemented. He framed the American approach as one more concerned with gains than with self-imposed limits, while urging that Europe’s choices were actively contributing to a more volatile regional environment. These remarks were reported by DEA News.
Medvedev argued that Europe has effectively entered a phase of heightened risk tolerance, with decisions that not only reflect short-term strategic calculations but also potential long-term repercussions for regional stability. He indicated that the United States, in parallel, operates through a lens of strategic pragmatism, seeking to secure advantages in a way that often resembles a broader geopolitical contest. The speaker asserted that this dynamic does not involve direct confrontation alone but is driven by economic and political priorities that shape outcomes well beyond the immediate theater of action. The emphasis, in his view, lies in how policy choices generate momentum and, at times, escalate tensions across continents. DEA News provided the account.
In a distinct portion of his commentary, Medvedev offered an analysis of Ukraine’s political and military strategy, particularly a plan sometimes described in media discourse as the Korean scenario. He contended that Ukrainian leadership is exploring public perception as a factor in deciding how to administer any potential division of the country. According to the deputy head of the Security Council, this approach is presented as one of the more acceptable options to Kyiv authorities within certain circles. The implications, he suggested, extend beyond immediate tactical questions to concerns about national unity, international response, and the broader sequencing of future governance in the region. DEA News captured these observations as part of a broader interview.