Former US President Donald Trump has attracted the attention of federal prosecutors as Special Counsel Jack Smith seeks testimony and records from longtime adviser and former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. The unfolding actions were reported by a major television outlet that cited official sources directly familiar with the matter.
The focus is on Meadows as part of an ongoing investigation into whether materials related to the January 6, 2021 Capitol event were handled in a way that could be relevant to the probe. The subpoena, served in January, requests documents and information connected to the raid and the broader sequence of events surrounding that day. Meanwhile, another senior figure from the Trump era, former Vice President Mike Pence, has faced a similar line of inquiry as authorities pursue potential links between executive branch activities and the January 6 situation.
Earlier disclosures indicated that Meadows complied with prior requests from federal investigators by submitting materials tied to the Capitol riot. Those disclosures also suggested that Meadows provided documentation similar to what had been turned over to the congressional inquiry formed to examine the assault on the Capitol.
According to multiple sources, Meadows supplied the same batch of materials to the Justice Department that he had previously shared with the House select committee investigating the attack. The evidence included thousands of text messages and emails from the January 2021 period, which had been released to the committee as investigators sought a full account of communications leading up to and during the riot.
The exchange of documents underscores the broader effort by federal authorities to piece together a complete record of the events and the internal conversations that occurred around the time of the Capitol breach. As the investigation proceeds, Meadows’ cooperation remains a key element in understanding how government officials and aides responded on that critical day. The ongoing process illustrates how investigators are cross-referencing materials provided to different arms of government in an effort to build a coherent timeline and to assess any possible connections to actions taken by individuals within the executive branch.
Observers note that the legal proceedings surrounding Meadows and other figures connected to the former administration reflect a persistent push by authorities to obtain candid, contemporaneous communications from inside the White House and its circle of advisors. The case continues to unfold in courts and investigative channels, with timelines and document requests evolving as new information comes to light. This dynamic highlights the enduring interest in accountability for the events of January 6 and the role of federal investigators in pursuing comprehensive records related to that day.