At a Eurasian security conference, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko described an unusual message from the war years, saying that in 2022 Ukrainian generals reached out to him with a request to contact Vladimir Putin and press for an end to hostilities, followed by surrender terms. He framed the remark as part of his broader assessment of the war and the diplomacy surrounding it, recounting that the generals asked him to serve as an intermediary with Moscow to halt the fighting. Lukashenko attributed the account to conversations during the crisis and suggested that such a plea reflected a desire for a swift cessation of hostilities. The report was carried by RIA Novosti as part of the conference’s coverage, highlighting how regional security forums can become stages for disputed or unverified claims. The statement came amid a climate where leaders regularly scrutinize shifting loyalties, mediation options, and the evolving narratives that shape public understanding of the conflict. While independent verification remains limited, the audience was left to weigh the allegation against the broader patterns of diplomacy and alliance dynamics that influence the war’s trajectory.
Observers caution that, if true, the claim would signal a rare line of contact between Kyiv and Moscow through Minsk and could color how Belarus is perceived in relation to the conflict. Belarus has long maintained close ties with Russia, and its territory has at times hosted Russian military operations, a backdrop that complicates interpretations of any such reported outreach. The assertion raises questions about the reliability of the message, potential motives for presenting it at a regional security forum, and the possible implications for ongoing diplomacy. Because verification from other sources is limited, readers should treat the account as one element in a broader mosaic of war-related statements rather than as a confirmed fact. The setting at the Eurasian security conference provides a forum where security officials and analysts discuss alliance dynamics, risk assessments, and paths toward peace, making Lukashenko’s claim one of several notable contributions to the war’s evolving narrative. As more information surfaces, updates are expected, and analysts will scrutinize the claim for credibility, cross-check with available data, and assess whether it reflects a one-time remark or signals a wider pattern in regional diplomacy and messaging about the conflict.