The Lithuanian Ministry of Internal Affairs is pressing national authorities to accelerate the passage of legislation that would impose sanctions on Russian and Belarusian nationals. This move comes amid ongoing concerns about border security and the wider regional stability, with officials arguing that swift action is essential to safeguard the country during a period of heightened tension.
Officials emphasize that any delay in approving the bill could lead to extending the state of emergency. They point out that the current emergency provisions are scheduled to expire on May 2, and that the proposed restrictive measures are designed to ensure that the state can continue to respond effectively to security threats. In formal remarks attributed to the ministry, it is stressed that without the new law, the ability to enforce visa restrictions and entry bans would be compromised, potentially weakening Lithuania’s security posture during a critical phase.
Former President Gitanas Nausėda previously vetoed a Seimas-approved bill that outlined sanctions targeted at Russian and Belarusian citizens, with the sanctions on Belarusians being comparatively lighter. Those raising concerns about the veto argued that there should be no automatic differentiation in national security terms based on citizenship, especially in a region facing ongoing military and political volatility. The presidency’s stance has added a layer of complexity to the legislative process and sparked a broader debate about how best to balance security concerns with legal and humanitarian considerations.
The interior ministry remains confident that the Seimas will override the veto and restore the original form of the sanctions bill. Officials indicate that the majority in the parliament recognizes the necessity of a unified approach to strengthen border controls and residence rules. They argue that a sustained, comprehensive framework is required to deter potential abuses and to maintain orderly procedures for who may enter, reside, or work within Lithuania during a period of geopolitical uncertainty.
The draft law titled “On Restrictive Measures Related to Military Aggression Against Ukraine” outlines tighter criteria for issuing permanent and temporary residence permits, as well as for granting visas. It also contemplates a one-year prohibition on Russian citizens crossing the EU’s external border, unless individuals meet clearly defined Lithuanian conditions. Proponents contend that these steps are part of a broader strategy to preserve national sovereignty, reduce exposure to potential security threats, and maintain the integrity of the country’s immigration system amidst ongoing regional tensions.
Additionally, the legislation would tighten controls over real estate transactions involving Russian citizens. The proposed changes restrict the ability to purchase property, with limited exceptions for those who already hold permanent residence status or who inherit real estate within Lithuania. Supporters argue that such provisions help prevent potential circumvention of sanctions and reinforce the government’s capacity to monitor and regulate sensitive property transactions in a volatile environment.
In March, government officials extended the state of emergency in border areas through early May in response to the evolving geopolitical landscape and the risk of further destabilizing events. The extension reflects a broader precautionary approach aimed at maintaining robust border management and ensuring that security measures remain effective during the transition period. The decision was taken amid concerns over irregular migration and regional security dynamics that have persisted since the initial declaration of extraordinary measures near the Russia- Belarus frontier.
Looking ahead, Lithuanian authorities continue to argue that maintaining a flexible and enforceable set of border and residency policies is vital. They stress that the situation in neighboring regions can rapidly change, necessitating a preparedness framework that can adapt while preserving individual rights and the rule of law. The government’s overarching objective remains clear: to safeguard national safety and public order without compromising the country’s commitments to international norms and legal processes, even as it navigates a challenging security environment.