In Moscow, a high-level exchange took place between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Wang Yi, a senior Chinese diplomat who heads the Office of the Foreign Commission of the CPC Central Committee. The meeting occurred in the context of ongoing concern over the war in Ukraine, with both sides engaging in a candid discussion about the crisis and prospects for a diplomatic path forward. The dialogue, as reported by the Russian Foreign Ministry, reflected a shared interest in stabilizing the situation through dialogue and negotiations rather than through military escalation or unilateral statements.
The Russian side emphasized that no separate or standalone plan had been presented or discussed in the talks. Instead, the focus was on broad principles for resolving the conflict through political channels and mutual concessions that could lead to a sustainable settlement. The ministry noted that Chinese partners outlined their perceptions of the Ukraine crisis, highlighting root causes from a global security perspective and offering viewpoints on how diplomacy might forge a realistic and workable path to peace.
Officials from Moscow also made clear that the statements circulating in some Western circles about a purported “Chinese peace plan” do not align with the substance of what was discussed. The press service underscored that Western commentary often distorts the actual positions shared in the discussions, which centered on constructive engagement and the search for common ground among major international actors.
Earlier reports indicated that Wang Yi and Lavrov had already met and engaged in a constructive exchange. Wang Yi’s remarks during the session referred to China’s openness to participate in diplomatic efforts and to support a process that could bring about a durable settlement in Ukraine. The exchange underscored a shared willingness to explore diplomatic channels, identify practical steps, and encourage all sides to remain committed to dialogue as a means to resolving differences and reducing regional tensions.
Both sides appeared to agree on the importance of multilateral dialogue and the role of international institutions in facilitating negotiations. The discussions in Moscow highlighted a mutual interest in avoiding the further deterioration of the humanitarian situation and in promoting stability across the region through coordinated, peaceful measures that respect the sovereignty and security concerns of all parties involved. The talks signaled a continued commitment to diplomacy as the preferred route to end hostilities and to rebuild trust among the international community, even amid a protracted and complex crisis.