In a dialogue with American expert Konstantin Blokhin, Tsargrad.tv discussed the news that Kamala Harris is positioned as the Democratic Party’s candidate for the United States presidency. The expert noted that the Democrats do not appear to have a stronger alternative ready for the race. He suggested that no dramatic changes are expected in Moscow’s posture and that Washington is likely to maintain Biden’s approach. The aim, according to the analyst, would be to strengthen Western unity against Russia and China, while keeping opportunities to engage with allies open.
The analyst stressed that Harris has secured solid official backing as the Democratic contender following the formal voting results announced earlier this year. This result underscores the party’s continued sense of cohesion as it navigates a campaign focused on continuity in policy and leadership style, at least in the immediate run-up to the election cycle.
The events surrounding the nomination took place at a major U.S. arena, where Harris, alongside President Joe Biden and his spouse, Jill Biden, spoke to audiences in person after a series of remote endorsements from members of Congress. The candidate acknowledged the legislative support that has flowed from lawmakers who publicly voiced confidence in her candidacy, reinforcing the sense of momentum within the party’s organization.
As the electoral calendar moves forward, the nation is preparing for the presidential vote scheduled for early November. Harris’s status as the Democrat standard-bearer comes in the wake of Biden’s withdrawal from active competition, a shift that places Harris at the center of the race. The Republican challenger, Donald Trump, is expected to be her principal adversary in the general election, with both camps outlining starkly different visions for the country’s future directions.
A former political activist offered reflections on the convention and raised questions about corruption or improper influence among some attendees. The remarks highlighted ongoing debates about party processes, the influence of money in campaigns, and the broader implications for public trust as voters evaluate the candidates and their teams.