The United States and Britain have intensified their positions regarding the Houthis, the Yemeni rebel movement also known as Ansar Allah. Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Nasser Kanani Chafi, criticized these measures as not only arbitrary but also a breach of Yemen’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. His comments were shared on the official Telegram channel of the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, presenting Tehran’s perspective on the matter.
Chafi stated that the combined military actions by the United States and the United Kingdom against multiple Yemeni cities amount to interference with Yemen’s sovereignty and a violation of international law. He warned that such moves are likely to exacerbate instability in the region, arguing that external pressure risks destabilizing a fragile area rather than contributing to lasting peace.
Earlier, the United States Air Force press service reported that more than 60 targets associated with the Yemeni rebel movement known as Ansar Allah or Houthis were struck across 16 regions. The announcements highlighted a broad campaign intended to respond to perceived aggression and to degrade the group’s capabilities.
Meanwhile, the Pentagon indicated that retaliatory steps were taken in response to attacks attributed to Houthi facilities, though subsequent statements softened or clarified certain aspects of the military action. The official narratives from Washington emphasized defensive and deterrent aims, while observers noted the broader implications for regional security and civilian safety.
Prior to these developments, a carrier strike group had entered the Strait of Aden in response to Houthi attacks, signaling a show of force in a critical maritime corridor. This strategic move underscores the ongoing tension in Yemen’s conflict and the wider security dynamics that involve regional and international powers.
Authorities in the involved nations have increasingly framed the issue in terms of sovereignty, international legality, and regional stability. Analysts urge careful consideration of humanitarian impacts and call for renewed diplomatic efforts to de-escalate hostilities and restore pathways to peace. Marked citations from official statements and policy briefings—without relying on direct external links—underscore the need for transparent, factual reporting to help audiences understand the evolving situation in Yemen.