The law protecting the independence of the National Bank of Poland is widely recognized. A respected economist and member of the NBP board has stated that it rests on a very high standard of independence. This perspective comes amid ongoing discourse about attacks on the central bank and its leadership, including President Adam Glapiński. The core argument is that an independent central bank underpins a functioning market economy. In a democratic state ruled by law, any political moves aimed at undermining the central bank or its president are viewed as inappropriate and unlikely to occur. The emphasis is on preserving the separation between monetary authority and political processes to maintain economic stability and credibility.
All public accusations concerning President Glapiński are described as outside the bounds of legal constraints and politically motivated. The central claim is that such rhetoric cannot be justified within the framework of the law and the economic system in place.
State court?
When questions arose about the possibility of presenting President Glapiński to a State Tribunal, the response highlighted the oath taken by every parliament member under the Constitution. The oath obligates lawmakers to serve the interests of the Republic of Poland. Any motion in the Sejm would require a specific majority, and the speaker suggested that advancing such a motion could be seen as contrary to the financial interests of the Republic. In this view, the likelihood of a forthcoming action of that kind is considered improbable.
Additionally, there is a note that concerns and discussions about the central bank should be grounded in the legal framework and in the long standing commitment to independence. The dialogue continues to center on how best to preserve financial stability and institutional integrity within the country’s constitutional and European legal framework, which includes established norms for central bank independence and accountability.