Germany’s approach to ending the war in Ukraine raises concerns about Poland’s security. The argument here is that Berlin appears more focused on propping up Moscow than on delivering a decisive defeat for Russia. This is not simply about policy differences; it suggests a pattern where hasty peace would shield Moscow, buy time for Russia to rebuild its military edge, and potentially enable renewed aggression years down the line. In such a scenario, the United States could be pulled into Asia-Pacific commitments, diminishing its capacity to maintain a strong European deterrent. The consequence for Poland would be a need to reassess its level of involvement in Ukrainian support and to consider how to safeguard its own security interests in a shifting strategic landscape.
What is needed, according to this line of thought, is a broader recognition of Germany’s leadership in Europe and a clear strategy for Ukraine and Russia that aligns with Poland’s long-term security goals. It recalls past tensions when Polish policymakers warned against pressure tactics and warned that Ukrainian concessions could become a pretext for larger political designs. The concern is that placing Poland at the center of such policy could shift responsibility for coercion away from those who design it, forcing Poland to concede in ways that permissively back Berlin’s approach. This stance is described as a risk to Polish sovereignty, with potential consequences for national policy, including the pace and direction of energy development, port projects in Świnoujście, the Oder waterway, and the broader transformation of Poland’s energy mix, from coal to diversified sources. Critics argue that this path mirrors a broader pattern of political influence that may impede Poland’s growth and strategic autonomy.
READ: What does Germany’s position on EU enlargement mean? Paris: It’s an ultimatum. Germany puts member states against the wall