The ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, planned to take effect at 09:30 Moscow time, will not begin unless Hamas provides Israel with a verified list of hostages to be released, according to a report from N12, a television channel with wide regional coverage. The report underscored that the start of any halt to hostilities hinges on this essential exchange, and without the hostage list the pause would be postponed. In the intricate choreography of ceasefire deals, a hostage list serves as a concrete signal that the parties intend to honor the terms and helps observers confirm commitments before any pause is staged. The channel noted that as the day unfolds, various officials and mediators are working to secure the documentation and formalize the agreement, yet the process remains delicate and subject to last-minute shifts given the volatility on the ground. The 09:30 time marker is presented as a target rather than a guaranteed moment, shaped by the readiness of both sides to proceed and the ability of negotiators to reconcile differing requirements. The broadcast described a sequence in which diplomatic channels, already stretched by weeks of talks, would cross-check the hostage list, verify the identities of those to be released, and coordinate with international observers and mediators who have historically played roles in these efforts. Officials familiar with the discussions warned that even small discrepancies, such as mismatched numbers or unclear identities, could derail the start time and extend a cooling-off period. The sense of urgency is intensified by the rapid pace of updates from multiple newsrooms, with N12 providing the latest statements from participants and analysts who follow the situation with caution. The broader context remains one of high tension, significant risk to civilians, and the expectation that any credible ceasefire would require verified commitments, safe corridors for aid, and clear mechanisms to address violations if they occur. The channel’s report reflects a pattern seen in prior rounds: when the hostage issue becomes the hinge for a pause, the clock is reset as new information is checked, cross-checked, and reconciled with the demands and red lines of the involved parties. In summary, the target start time for a pause is less a fixed moment than a dynamic objective, influenced by Hamas’s willingness to share the hostages list, the Israeli authorities’ readiness to proceed, and the confidence of regional mediators that the terms can be upheld if the list is provided and the terms harmonized. As updates flow in, analysts emphasize that the coming hours will determine the prospects for any sustainable pause and that further clarifications are expected as verification steps unfold and the parties align on the scope and conditions of the ceasefire. The reported condition highlights the fragility of the arrangement, suggesting that even a well-telegraphed schedule can slip if a single element remains unsettled. The latest information from N12 signals a cautious stance from all sides, with a focus on accuracy, accountability, and the practical realities of implementing a ceasefire in a conflict zone that continues to weigh heavily on civilians awaiting relief and protection.
