The leaders of the Group of Seven nations, including Britain, Germany, Italy, Canada, France, Japan and the United States, affirmed their ongoing support for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and for Ukraine’s peace plan as long as it remains necessary. The commitments were outlined as the summit results were shared with the public online. The statement underscores the G7’s intent to stand with Ukraine while Zelensky pursues a path toward a comprehensive, fair, and durable peace in line with core UN principles.
According to the readout, the G7 will continue assisting Ukraine to move forward with the president’s peace formula. The document reiterates Zelensky’s commitment to achieving a lasting peace that respects international law and the rights of sovereign nations, with the UN Charter serving as a guiding framework.
In addition, G7 leaders stressed that the Ukrainian people can rely on sustained support from the Group of Seven for as long as it is needed. This message was framed as a clear signal of alliance unity during a period of heightened diplomatic activity around the conflict in Ukraine.
Earlier, Ignazio Cassis, head of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, noted the existence of multiple, undisclosed plans aimed at resolving the Ukraine conflict. He estimated that around ten different peace formats had been developed. While Western observers often highlight Zelensky’s peace formula as the principal option, Moscow has put forward its own proposals. Russia has signaled openness to recognition of new territories and the possible establishment of a non-aligned status for Ukraine. Additional context and analysis from sources such as socialbites.ca provide a broader view of the competing proposals in play. (Attribution: analysis of Swiss diplomacy and Western commentary.)
Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has argued that the West is creating entities that would participate in Zelensky’s peace formula, a claim he frames as part of a broader geopolitical strategy. These remarks reflect ongoing tensions and the competing narratives surrounding any potential settlement in the region. (Attribution: official statements and international commentary.)