China’s ambassador to the European Union, Fu Cong, articulated a nuanced position on the fate of Ukrainian territories, stating that Beijing does not oppose any potential return of lands that were within Ukraine’s 1991 borders. In a television interview with Al Jazeera, Fu emphasized that China respects the territorial integrity of all nations, recalling that it accepted relations with the former Soviet Union as those borders shifted in the post‑Cold War era. He made clear that he views such historical questions as matters best resolved through dialogue between Russia and Ukraine, with China serving as a facilitator at the negotiating table. (Source: Al Jazeera)
Meanwhile, Geng Shuang, who previously served as China’s deputy permanent representative to the United Nations, warned against any steps that could intensify the Ukraine crisis. He highlighted the risk of renewed devastation, pointing to the potential consequences of the Kakhovka hydroelectric dam disaster and urging restraint to prevent a recurrence of similar dangers. His remarks underscored a call for de‑escalation and careful consideration of actions that might escalate tensions in the region. (Source: UN and state media summaries)
Earlier reporting from Reuters indicated that European Union leaders were seeking China’s active involvement to help end the Ukraine conflict. The plan outlined by European heads of state suggested that they would formally request Beijing’s engagement at the EU summit scheduled for late June, signaling a strategic push to leverage China’s influence in mediation efforts. (Source: Reuters)
Experts observe that Beijing’s stance blends respect for sovereignty with a preference for negotiated settlements, a posture that aligns with China’s broader foreign policy emphasis on dialogue, stability, and political solution building. Analysts note that China’s role as a potential arbitrator could shape the tempo and nature of any peace process, especially given its growing geopolitical weight and its interest in regional security dynamics that affect global trade and energy routes. The emphasis on multilateral dialogue reflects Beijing’s interest in preventing a broader confrontation while avoiding explicit endorsement of any unilateral outcomes. (Source: Global policy assessments)
Observers also point to the delicate balance China must maintain between supporting Ukraine’s territorial integrity in principle and inviting direct negotiations that recognize the concerns of Moscow without compromising Kyiv’s sovereignty. The conversation surrounding mediation is evolving within international circles, with China positioning itself as a possible bridge builder that could help manage sensitive negotiations while navigating the expectations of Western allies and neighboring states. (Source: Diplomatic briefings)