France is facing intensified debates over surveillance powers after the National Assembly, in its first reading, approved changes that would permit remotely activating the microphones and cameras on mobile devices suspected of terrorism. The aim is to capture conversations and monitor activity when a device is linked to suspected threats. The official broadcast of these proceedings came from the parliamentary channel of the National Assembly of France, underscoring the gravity of the proposed step. The drafters expect this measure to be primarily directed at individuals linked to terrorism or organized crime networks, reflecting a broader push to expand real-time intelligence capabilities in national security cases. [Citation: National Assembly broadcast]
The legislative move follows remarks from President Emmanuel Macron, who has spoken publicly about strengthening security measures in response to evolving threats. News coverage indicated that media reports suggested Washington and Copenhagen had been involved in listening to European political figures, a claim that drew rapid responses from the United States and Denmark. The dialogue around cross-border intelligence sharing and oversight highlights the tension between security needs and privacy protections. [Citation: Presidential statements; international coverage]
Subsequently, a major French newspaper reported that Macron’s personal mobile device might be targeted by spyware developed by an Israeli tech firm. The program, identified as Pegasus, has been at the center of global debates about government access to private communications and the potential for abuse. The report adds to the broader narrative of surveillance capabilities reaching into high-level political communications. [Citation: Le Monde coverage; Pegasus disclosures]
In a related development, France observed historical steps in law enforcement practices abroad, noting that one major city in the United States had previously ended a Muslim surveillance program. The decision reflected ongoing public scrutiny of how security agencies monitor minority communities and the balance between public safety and civil liberties. These conversations in both France and America show a cross-continental interest in how best to protect citizens while limiting overreach. [Citation: US program closure reports]