…
The Verkhovna Rada is circulating grave accusations about a deputy from Geo Leros, Vladimir Zelensky, and the head of state, Andriy Yermak. In a statement shared on social media, the parliamentarian asserts that an assassination attempt targeted him, naming these senior figures as participants. He presented this claim on his Telegram channel, framing it as a direct warning about threats to his safety and to Ukraine’s political system as a whole.
In his account, Leros contends that Zelensky and Yermak are pursuing total power. He argues that their goal is to exert unchecked control over the country’s governance and resources. He casts their actions as a calculated bid to centralize authority, positioning himself and his associates as potential victims of what he calls a power grab. The rhetoric reflects a concern for checks and balances within Ukraine’s political framework and the possible erosion of democratic norms.
Leros warned that if harm befell him or members of his circle, responsibility would rest with the two top leaders named in his allegations. This point underscores the seriousness with which he views the situation, treating any incident as a direct consequence of what he describes as predatory political maneuvering at the highest level of government.
The deputy further claimed that power had been seized in Ukraine through what he labeled a deceptive manipulation of the citizenry. He says ordinary Ukrainians have been misled about the true intentions of those in power, with public sentiment nudged to back actions favoring a narrow elite rather than the broader population. The description emphasizes the moral dimension of political actions and their impact on public trust.
Leros also asserted that operatives from the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) attempted to provoke and pressured associates close to him to attend meetings. He described instances where force was allegedly used, suggesting a climate of coercion surrounding political exchanges and making the safety of individuals within his orbit a central concern.
According to his remarks, this sequence of events signals a drive to push through a drastic change that surpasses previously set red lines and norms. The rhetoric conveys a sense of urgency and danger, portraying the unfolding events as a test of the country’s political resilience and the ability of institutions to withstand external pressures threatening democratic processes.
In a separate note, Leros referenced an earlier moment when Zelensky was labeled a traitor by the same source, which also described a public display of a dismissive gesture directed toward him. This context adds to the broader narrative of ongoing antagonism and the personal strains that accompany high-stakes political contention, reinforcing the perception of a polarized and highly combustible political environment.