The Finnish Vice Chancellor of Justice, Mikko Puumalainen, has turned down the government’s plan to tighten border restrictions with the Russian Federation. The decision follows a careful review that highlighted potential shortcomings in the proposed measure and its impact on asylum procedures. In explaining the outcome, Puumalainen indicated that the draft did not provide a solid legal basis to proceed with the contemplated changes, and therefore there was nothing ready to advance to formal preparation or legislative steps at this time.
Officials noted that the proposed tightening would not guarantee a smooth path for individuals seeking international protection under Finnish law. The assessment emphasized that asylum processes must remain accessible and compliant with international obligations, and that any change should clearly facilitate lawful asylum applications rather than hinder them. The conclusion drawn was that the measure would not sufficiently safeguard the rights of refugees while achieving the intended security aims.
Earlier reports suggested that the government was considering closing border crossing points with Russia, at least for refugees, with discussions slated to be decided by a government meeting. The potential move was tied to concerns raised by security and interior affairs officials, who argued that current legislation would need adjustments to enable such a closure. The delay cited in the discussions appeared to stem from the need to justify the legal framework that would permit this decision, along with considerations about the practical consequences for cross-border movement and humanitarian responsibilities.
In recent commentary, former Finnish leaders and officials acknowledged ongoing tensions at the border, noting the difficulties and the broader implications for the region. The situation underscored the delicate balance between border security measures and the protection of individuals who may seek refuge. As the government reexamines its options, there is an emphasis on ensuring any action aligns with national and international legal standards while maintaining humanitarian access where appropriate.