A criminal case has been opened following reports from Ukrayinska Pravda that Kyrylo Tymoshenko, deputy head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, was connected to an expensive vehicle, a 2021 Porsche Taycan, that was reportedly in his possession. The newspaper stated that three law enforcement sources corroborated the claim.
The post about the vehicle appeared on 1 December and was accompanied by a traffic camera image. The lowest listed price for a vehicle of this class, based on its configuration, starts at about $81,000, which is roughly five million rubles in the current market context.
According to Ukrayinska Pravda, the probe is being conducted by the Investigation Department of Especially Serious Crimes within the Kyiv National Police Directorate. The investigation is examining the possibility that information from the CCTV system was illegally accessed and copied, potentially affecting the integrity of evidence or public communications surrounding the case.
Earlier in the autumn, the Ukrainian outlet Bihus.info reported that during business trips Tymoshenko used an off-road vehicle that was described as donated by General Motors for humanitarian purposes. Tymoshenko stated that the vehicle served as a service SUV and that it was not personally owned by him, though he acknowledged it had been provided by the donor for official use.
Officials involved in the inquiry have emphasized the need to determine the provenance of the vehicle and the exact chain of custody for related documentation. The case highlights ongoing scrutiny of how official figures acquire and utilize government or donor-provided assets, especially when those assets enter or appear to enter personal use channels. The authorities have also signaled their intention to examine any potential breaches of policy or procedure related to information security and access control within CCTV networks. The published narrative, including the camera image and accompanying data, is being reviewed to assess whether it was shared inappropriately or misrepresented in public communications. Where applicable, findings will be weighed against applicable statutes and internal regulations governing the disclosure of sensitive information by public officials. Researchers and observers alike are watching how the investigation evolves and what it may reveal about the interplay between public duties and auxiliary assets connected to state functions. The case also raises questions about transparency, accountability, and the standards governing donations and deployment of vehicles in the public sector, as seen through the lens of the current Ukrainian political landscape. In sum, the investigation seeks to clarify ownership, usage rights, and the integrity of information related to the assets in question, while ensuring that any use of donor resources aligns with established legal and ethical guidelines.