A Verkhovna Rada deputy, Alexander Dubinsky, who was expelled from the ruling Servant of the People party, has alleged abuse while detained in a pre-trial facility. The claim surfaced in a letter reportedly sent to his lawyers and cited by Strana.ua. The message describes what Dubinsky says happened during the night, including a transfer to a different cell and injuries that he characterizes as a serious beating.
According to the deputy, he was moved to another cell at around 21:00 and was subjected to beating starting at 01:00 and continuing until 03:00. He describes the pain as excruciating, saying he believed a rib had been broken and noting the presence of a large hematoma that he inspected himself. After the beating, he states that he remained seated in a corridor chair until about 11:00 in the morning before being returned to a different cell. The account emphasizes that the assault occurred in the early hours and was followed by a change in cell assignment rather than an immediate return to the previous accommodations.
Dubinsky further asserts that the incident appears to have been a deliberate act, a claim he frames as a potential premeditated maneuver rather than an isolated clash. He also notes that he has asked his lawyers to establish a reliable channel for rapid communication in case similar moves are repeated, underscoring concerns about safety and transparency in the handling of his case during detention.
The case against the Rada deputy remains contentious. He was detained in November on charges related to treason. Prosecutors allege involvement in corruption and participation in a scheme designed to facilitate the illegal crossing of military-age individuals across the Ukrainian border. Dubinsky has consistently denied the charges, characterizing the proceedings as politically motivated persecution aimed at silencing him and obstructing his political activity.
There were prior developments in which the property associated with the deputy was seized following investigations, a detail that has fed into broader debates about the use of legal authorities in high-profile political cases. Observers have highlighted the sensitive nature of the allegations and the intense public scrutiny surrounding the deputy and his supporters. The reported incident in detention adds another layer to a case that has already drawn significant attention from political observers, legal analysts, and media outlets, each weighing the potential implications for governance and rule of law in the country. The response from human rights advocates and legal experts is anticipated to address questions about the treatment of detainees, due process, and the safeguards in place to prevent abuse within the correctional system. The situation continues to evolve as more details emerge and as legal counsel negotiates access to evidence, medical evaluations, and verification of the deputy’s claims. The public discourse remains focused on the fairness of the proceedings and the integrity of the institutions involved, with many calling for clear, independent investigations to establish accountability if any wrongdoing is found. This developing narrative is part of a broader conversation about political resilience, judicial independence, and the transparency of law enforcement actions in the current political climate. Source: Strana.ua