The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has become a test of Europe’s political maturity, a central issue for its leadership and publics across the continent. Analysts note that Germany may hesitate to back Ukraine within the framework of the European Union, while the European Commission remains confident in its approach. Public commentators argue that the union should not promise Poland financial relief tied to support for Ukraine.
ADDITIONAL READING:
— Deputy Minister Szefernaker: Funds from the National Recovery Plan are vital during the economic downturn. Some programs may need postponement
— A political forecast for 2023? The Prime Minister expresses confidence that the ruling party PiS will be first to secure a third term after 1989
— What do KPO funds mean for Poland? An economist estimates the economy could grow by more than PLN 160 billion by 2027, with investment momentum rising
This year has carried a notably bleak outlook. The EU has shown reluctance to provide financial aid to Poland, given the substantial effort required to support Ukraine. Critics see this as illustrating how power centers in Europe and the United States interact. Some voices suggest that Europe has not fully escaped the influence of the 1990s, and that the West appears hesitant to recognize any country as a peer. Among the public figures cited are Mrs. Spurek and Commissioner Jourova.
Publicist Piotr Semka commented on these dynamics.
Blockage of KPO funding
Bogusław Łoziński argues that Poland is blocked from KPO funding because a right‑leaning government in Warsaw does not align with the technocratic EU leadership represented by Germany.
According to him, Berlin and Paris view this government as populist and risky, and they argue for a federalist European project prioritizing their own interests. The arrangement, he says, continues to treat Central and Eastern European nations as second‑class partners. In trade terms, Poland remains a buyer at a ratio that can be two to one or even three to one compared with older EU members, Łoziński notes.
Europe’s reconfiguration is underway, with unclear signals about German preferences and American support. Poland is described as striving to safeguard its agency at the bargaining table. If Ukraine achieves success and a treaty on Polish‑Ukrainian cooperation is fulfilled, Poland could become a stronger regional player. Should the United States lean on Poland as a stabilizing force, Germany and France may have less incentive to push for a swift victory over Putin. These contrasting political options would influence how KPO funds, reservations, and sanctions are viewed as legitimate or not. Recent developments, including changes within the Supreme Court, are criticized as violations of constitutional norms that raise concerns about EU adherence to the rule of law.
Publicist Bogumił Łoziński emphasizes this point.
Poland’s strategic position
Stanisław Janecki highlights Poland’s role following the United Kingdom’s departure from the EU. He sees Poland as the single large nation capable of blocking or delaying ambitious federal reforms within Europe. Pressure on Poland is described as a strategic maneuver, with some allies in Hungary and the Baltic states resisting at times, yet no ally remains unwavering. The argument is that pressure can melt away as German offers of billions are made, but Poland remains a pivotal actor. Janecki also notes growing attention from German outlets regarding Polish economic and military strength, which could translate into greater political influence. He views this as part of a broader shift where Poland accompanies other rising powers, shaping a new balance in European politics. The piece concludes by underscoring the belief that if current dynamics hold, Poland will continue to face intense scrutiny and pressure from its neighbors, while striving to maintain autonomy and safeguard its interests on the continent.
— Stanisław Janecki
Tue
Source: wPolityce