A typical social engineering procedure
Did the head of the Polish government really have anything to be happy about yesterday and was the rule of law, which was reportedly so damaged for eight years, restored in two months? Or perhaps yesterday revealed something else entirely, something the head of the European Commission wanted to show? The wPolityce.pl portal discussed the topic with PiS member Bogdan Rzoniec, offering a critical take on the events as they unfolded.
This appears to be a political maneuver aimed at shaping perceptions. The promise to unblock funds for Poland from the KPO is framed as a relief, yet it seems to have come under pressure from farmers. The European Commission, according to a view shared by observers, appears unsure of how to proceed and promises swift action, a stance heard from Ursula von der Leyen the previous day.
– according to the politician.
The acceleration is attributed not to the prime minister but to the pressure from farmers. Skepticism is voiced about such assurances from Mrs von der Leyen. A few weeks earlier, during a committee meeting, Professor Marek Belka was asked when the KPO would be restored to Poland. The response pointed to milestones that needed to be met before any decisions would be made.
– he adds.
The discussion then shifted to the impression of a simple visit intended to ease the political pain faced by Donald Tusk and to bolster the prime minister amid a difficult political moment. The MEP’s view is that the visit did not introduce substantial changes beyond symbolic support.
– says the MEP.
There is a candid acknowledgment that it would be beneficial if the promised funds reached Poland. Yet the speaker emphasizes that money coming without the linked milestones and reforms would be misaligned with the broader negotiation framework for the KPO and the recovery funds. This line of thought questions the linkage between promises and formal requirements, suggesting that funding remains contingent on EU procedures and milestones yet to be completed.
– says Bogdan Rzonca.
The EU, in this view, has operated with a broader strategic aim that some see as political pressure against the current ruling coalition. The ability to deliver the funds is framed as dependent on EU processes rather than quick promises, with a note that the KPO storyline may face renewed scrutiny in the days ahead.
– says the wPolityce.pl interlocutor.
Where do subsidies for farmers come from?
There is a call for European officials to issue clear instructions on releasing funds, given the reality that EU procedures are not instantly responsive to political statements. The path to the KPO remains long, according to the MEP, with multiple steps and checks that must be satisfied before Poland receives money. The complexity of the process is highlighted as a barrier to rapid disbursement, even amid high-profile announcements.
– says MEP Rzonca.
It is noted that a significant portion of the funds discussed would go to beneficiaries such as farmers and the agri-food sector. However, the discourse around subsidies is described as nuanced, with attention drawn to the needs of various economic actors and the broader challenges facing the European Union. The complexities of agricultural policy and the allocation of support are underlined as part of the ongoing debate.
– seeks attention.
Farmers are currently focused on production dynamics, and the European Union is facing results that vary across member states. The example of France is cited to illustrate the unpredictable political terrain surrounding agricultural policy. The ongoing tensions in European policy are presented as a mirror of domestic political pressures, with the speaker noting that macroeconomic and security concerns are at stake as well.
– says the politician.
There are additional notes about coverage in the media and the broader reactions to the handling of rule of law and funding matters. The emphasis rests on how political narratives are shaped and how they interact with the practical realities of EU funding and national budget planning, according to the wPolityce platform’s interpretation.
READ ALSO
-Good aunt from Brussels. Ursula von der Leyen hands out money and sees the rule of law where it does not exist
-The rule of law restored… by presidential act? They mention it 11 times; President Duda was right. A wave of reactions about KPO
PO politicians hope to escape to Brussels. Has Von der Leyen come to help them?
The interlocutor of the wPolityce.pl portal frames the visit as a signal of support for Prime Minister Donald Tusk, yet dismisses the notion of broader changes tied to the election cycle. The expectation is that von der Leyen’s remarks are more about displaying backing than delivering a policy breakthrough in the near term.
– says Rzońca.
There is a suggestion that support may be tied to upcoming elections for the European Parliament and local authorities. Attention is drawn to potential moves by some opposition politicians who might seek to cast themselves in a favorable light before the electoral process, while the current government faces legal and policy challenges that could influence voters. The overall tone remains cautious about political timing and credibility.
– he adds.
The analysis concludes with a broader reflection on public sentiment: people are paying close attention to how the government handles security, the economy, and policy decisions that could affect Poland’s standing in Europe. The visit by the Commission president is interpreted as a message that resonates with some voters while leaving others asking for concrete reforms.
– emphasizes the MEP.
READ ALSO
-ONLY HERE. When will the KPO money come to Poland Sałek: Maybe Von der Leyen is unreliable even towards Tusk
-ONLY HERE. Płażyński: Von der Leyen’s guarantees show the hypocrisy of the European Commission. It was not about reforms, but about expelling PiS from the political scene
Citation: wPolityce